Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rocky Mountain Int'l (OTC:RMIL former OTC:OVIS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Hawkmoon who wrote (21000)	11/23/1997 12:24:00 AM
From: s martin	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 55532

The Michael Puhr incident is going to be interesting, that's fer shure. First he takes a certificate from a company he is with and assigns it to another company RMCW and wah la.... supposedly RMCW is worth $14,000,00. How'd he do dat ? Then as a licensed broker, he is appointed to become head of a water bottling operation and is paid in stock for that. How'd he do dat ? Now here comes Mawork saying Puhr's been reported to the NASD for certain activities and next day he is no longer President according to RMIL's press release. How'd he do dat? Hmmmmmmmmm

To: Hawkmoon who wrote (21000)	11/23/1997 12:32:00 AM
From: Yacht Trash	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 55532

OK, mr. freekin voice of wisdom (I'm sorry, reason is back) Uh oh!!! Everyone run for the exits!!! Ronny is here to save us. I DON'T LIKE TREATS RONNYBOY!!! Are you here to save me as well??? Garry :-)

To: Hawkmoon who wrote (21000)	11/23/1997 12:38:00 AM
From: Ellen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 55532

An officer of the company (Mr. Puhr) apparently has(had?) a conflict of interest due to his being a registered broker. I'm sorry Ron, but I just don't see why anyone considers this an issue. If Mr. Puhr is a registered broker then removing himself as CEO addresses what could possibly be construed as a conflict of interest. Doesn't seem any different than an attorney removing himself from a case due to a possible appearance of a conflict of interest. Doesn't seem any different than a doctor not operating on a relative. Think an issue is trying to be made here by the nays from a non-issue. something from nothing