SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Any info about Iomega (IOM)? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: D.J.Smyth who wrote (37030)11/23/1997 2:15:00 AM
From: Naggrachi  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 58324
 
<<sorry, michael but i've been given some speculative information regarding iom but given our current situation it wouldn't serve anyone's purpose to speak of it. >>

Well since you opened the can of worms, would you mind to enlighten us as to what the info in.

Thanks in advance

Zead



To: D.J.Smyth who wrote (37030)11/23/1997 7:23:00 AM
From: W. Clinton Terry  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 58324
 
Darrell:

I am concerned about your post. On the one hand, you indicate that you have some speculative information about IOM, but that you do not see any usefulness in discussing it. On the other hand, you suggest the stock price may go down to 17, of all things, before it goes up. This suggests that your speculative information is negative. Since your posts are highly informative and knowledgable, perhaps I am taking this post with greater concern than it is intended.

Clinton



To: D.J.Smyth who wrote (37030)11/23/1997 8:33:00 AM
From: KM  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 58324
 
Darrell: Having thrown out the suggestion of "speculative information", without detailing your info or its source, could you at least advise us if it is of a positive or negative bias and let everyone decide how much weight they wish to give it. Personally, I always get suspicious when there's too much positive or negative spin on anything - always think someone's trying to either get clients in or out. Right now, there seems to be a love fest building for IOM - sometimes that can set at least an intermediate top. C'mon, you tantalized us, throw us a bone at least.



To: D.J.Smyth who wrote (37030)11/23/1997 4:10:00 PM
From: Brendan2012  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 58324
 
>>sorry, michael but i've been given some speculative information regarding iom but given our current situation it wouldn't serve anyone's purpose to speak of it<<

Such a tease! Come on, you can tell us!

Brendan