SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Chuca Marsh who wrote (28163)11/23/1997 8:26:00 AM
From: Richard Mazzarella  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 35569
 
Chuca, Reread all the past press release and compare them to the current one. Nobody want to kill your dream, but there is a simple duck test. One thing that I hold on to is Le's comment that IPM is not like those other dirt's, I certainly hope so. Is there still a shareholder protection plan? Tick tock.



To: Chuca Marsh who wrote (28163)11/23/1997 10:14:00 AM
From: ddl  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 35569
 
Chuck, you say " I don't believe the guy is wrong."
CL says "I'm right, you're wrong"

All I want to know is, who's right? ;-)



To: Chuca Marsh who wrote (28163)11/23/1997 11:05:00 AM
From: O. H. Rundell  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 35569
 
Chucaubud, In reference to CL, I don't believe the guy is wrong. JMO. : Would you please tell me when he was right?
Sorry, to keep banging on this one, but I cannot believe that you've actually done that retrospective survey of CL's advice (e.g., with IPM at ~$14, "Don't sell, it's going to 20).
O. H.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News