Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jorj X Mckie who wrote (477164)	3/17/2012 12:40:48 PM
From: greenspirit	2 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793955

I've long believed they should set aside .xxx on the web for porn, that way the content can be more easily controlled by parents looking out for the kids best interest. Some laws and some controls just make common sense.

To: Jorj X Mckie who wrote (477164)	3/17/2012 1:50:52 PM
From: Brumar89	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793955

Child porn and rape porn (where someone is actually raped) does not involve consenting adults. That's true as it pertains to the making of such things, but once it's been made why would an absolutist view of the 1st amendment provide a reason for objection? Note, that I'm (pretty literally) being a devil's advocate here and I don't favor such an absolutist view. BTW the SC has ruled that child porn involving animated images that look real is constitutional. I don't think the US is in danger of becoming Saudi Arabia.