Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Obama - Clinton Disaster -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Wayners who wrote (68145)	3/28/2012 2:04:12 PM
From: DuckTapeSunroof	3 Recommendations Read Replies (8) \| Respond to of 103300

Re: "If that is true" [His father's fiancée lives there, and Martin was returning to her home after buying candy and a drink at a nearby convenience store.] It is fact. (Now... my main question is WHY they didn't give a drug and alcohol test to the shooter the night of the shooting? ['Cause they did to the body on the ground.]) Wouldn't that be standard police procedure for ANY shooting? Even if it was an officer-involved shooting? So why didn't they? Also, why didn't they pull the rap sheet of the shooter? (He had two charges on his sheet, one for assaulting an officer, and one for domestic violence). They looked for a police record for the dead kid but they didn't for the shooter. That's just wacked. Both should be looked at in any fatal shooting. Also... I read that the LEAD INVESTIGATING OFFICER pushed (for two weeks) for a charge of manslaughter to be made... but was over-ruled by higher-ups in the department. Who made the decision to over-rule the investigating officer?