Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: longnshort who wrote (86517)	3/29/2012 11:48:16 AM
From: Cautious_Optimist	1 Recommendation Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 89467

There were "scientists" who argued against the Copernican revolution; there are still "faith" scientists who argue against evolution. This dude is a longtime part of the climate denial movement... the rate of atmospheric CO2 rise is good for us argument is pure silliness. We heard the same bulldookey from tobacco industry "Doctors" about smoking being healthy, and I can remember the nuclear industry telling us that radiation was natural, and good for us -- not to be feared. Our local Bay Area talk show Physics Professor self proclaimed "smartest man in the world" Sierra Club and liberal hating Bill Wattenberg was for decades, a nightly drumbeat for the relative safety of radiation. The danger represented by the unnatural rise in Greenhouse gasses is fact.