SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Mainstream Politics and Economics -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: JBTFD who wrote (14135)3/31/2012 2:55:23 PM
From: Bearcatbob1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 85487
 
It is not standards that is the issue with cross border insurance - it is what different states mandate. What is needed is the ability of people to buy simple catastrophic insurance.

Bob



To: JBTFD who wrote (14135)3/31/2012 3:16:00 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 85487
 
Health care companies will base out of whatever state has the lowest standards so the end result is the lowest standards become the standards for all.

The standards will be set by the market, and there will be more market competition with the more open market, so it will be more able to set standards.

At the same time states will still have laws against fraud and such, no state is going to toss those out (and if they would then the current state regulation would be just as problematic).



To: JBTFD who wrote (14135)4/1/2012 12:18:48 PM
From: sm1th3 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 85487
 
Open competition across state lines effectively takes away any state power to regulate health care in their state.

That state power is the primary cause of high health costs. Legislature mandate benefits paid for with other people's money.