SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Groupon, Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: stockman_scott who wrote (235)4/21/2012 7:00:32 PM
From: Glenn Petersen1 Recommendation  Respond to of 480
 
As Stock Continues Dive to All-Time Lows, Can Groupon Regain Investor Confidence?

Tricia Duryee
All Things D
April 18, 2012 at 3:27 pm PT

Groupon’s stock continued a downward spiral three weeks after it revised its fourth-quarter results to account for higher than expected returns during the holiday period.

Friday, shares of the Chicago-based deals site closed at a new low of close to $11. At that price, it is now worth just over $7 billion, down 57 percent since the company went public last November and well off the more than $10 billion it was valued at as tech’s hottest start-up of 2011.

Ironically, Groupon’s current market valuation is actually not much more than the $6 billion offered for it by search giant Google in late 2010.

The fall for Groupon has been swift, from the honorific of being the fastest-growing company ever to one that cannot keep control of that runaway growth.

That’s perhaps no surprise.

Perhaps most significantly, Groupon went public in just four years, delivering the biggest tech IPO since Google.

The quicksilver move was typical for it. In just two years’ time, the company ballooned from 37 employees to 9,625 and from serving five markets in the U.S. to 175 in North America alone. And that’s leaving out massive expansion abroad. In the past year, Groupon has acquired roughly 17 companies, including many international copycats.

The company also has entered many new segments, expanding from selling lower-priced and simpler deals on restaurants and spas to more complex and pricey arenas, including travel, physical goods and luxury items.

But Groupon is now learning that its original business does not work across just any segment, especially to more discerning customers of its higher-level and more expensive offerings.

In fact, it was those newer and potentially more lucrative markets that forced the company to recently revise the company’s fourth-quarter report after returns skyrocketed on luxury items, such as Lasik eye surgery.

The problems forced Groupon to lower revenue in the period by $14.3 million and net income by $22.6 million. It is now reporting a wider net loss of $64.9 million on revenue of $492 million, pushing it further away from its goal of profitability.

The company also disclosed at the time that independent auditors had noted “material weakness” in its financial controls. In addition, the The Wall Street Journal reported that the Securities and Exchange Commission was examining Groupon’s revision.

With many companies, investors might have shrugged such accounting issues off, but the impact on the stock has been greater since they are only the latest in a string of similar mistakes at Groupon.

In its pre-IPO period, for example, Groupon was forced to restate revenues after counting both its portion of the revenue and the revenue that goes to the merchant together. It also had to dump a controversial accounting metric that made the company look more profitable than it was, because it did not include important costs, such as critical online marketing expenses to attract new customers.

Those came after the company retracted a statement by Eric Lefkofsky, Groupon’s co-founder and executive chairman, who told Bloomberg in an interview that Groupon would be “wildly profitable.”

At least the wild part was accurate.

Much of the blame for these missteps by Wall Street is being aimed at CEO and co-founder Andrew Mason, the iconoclastic 31-year-old entrepreneur who is largely responsible for defining the company’s culture, as well as Jason Child and Joe Del Preto, the chief financial and accounting officers, respectively.

Child joined the company in December 2010, coming from Amazon, where he held several roles over a 10-year period — including VP of finance, international, and director of investors relations. Prior to joining Amazon, he worked at Arthur Andersen as a certified public accountant.

Del Preto has been Groupon’s chief accounting officer for the past year and, before that, he was the company’s global controller for three months. Before Groupon, he was controller and VP of finance at Echo Global Logistics and also served as controller at InnerWorkings, the same company where Mason was a computer programmer in his early career.

Mason, of course, is the best known and the person most responsible for establishing the company’s whimsical culture and managing — or mis-managing, depending to how you look it it — Groupon’s hard-charging growth.

It will also be up to him to turn it all around, as the company sinks in both value and investor regard. Since the restatement, Mason has said little about how he intends to do that. In February, when Mason concluded Groupon’s first-ever earnings call, he said: “Thanks, guys, this was a lot of fun, and I look forward to many more of these.”

It’s not clear fun will be on the agenda at his next outing on Groupon’s first-quarter call in mid-May.

But, let it be said that Mason is also well aware of the risks. He’s framed and hung in the lobby at the company’s Chicago headquarters a number of gushing magazine articles from the tech boom about once high-flying companies, such as Myspace and Napster, that later faded.

Mason said he did so as reminder of how not to build a company. And, to emphasize that point, a cover of his own grinning visage sits right in the center of them all.

allthingsd.com



To: stockman_scott who wrote (235)4/30/2012 5:15:50 PM
From: Glenn Petersen1 Recommendation  Respond to of 480
 
As anticipated:

Confirmed: Schultz and Efrusy to Leave Groupon Board; “Accounting Types” Joining

Kara Swisher
All Things D
April 30, 2012 at 12:40 pm PT

According to sources close to the situation, Starbucks Chairman and CEO Howard Schultz and Accel Partners’ Kevin Efrusy will be stepping down from the board of Groupon.

Schultz’s departure will be effective today, but Efrusy — who was critical to the initial funding around the Chicago-based daily deals site — will not be standing for re-election at the company’s annual meeting in June.

The departures are voluntary, but sources said the pair will be replaced by two new directors with significantly more fiscal oversight experience, whom one source characterized as “accounting types.”

(Update: Groupon just posted a press release noting the board departures, with the names of the new board pencil pushers: Daniel Henry, CFO of American Express, and Deloitte Vice Chairman Robert Bass. Henry joins immediately in Schultz’s place. Full press release below.)

It is a move that is critical given Groupon’s recent series of missteps around its financial reporting that have hurt both its reputation and, more importantly, its stock.

Interestingly, several sources noted that Schultz almost left the board right before Groupon’s public offering last fall, after several ongoing disputes with its management, but stayed on so as not to scuttle its IPO.

The board of the company has not involved itself as prominently in the accounting messes at the company, but it appears as if they will begin to now.

It must, given Groupon shares have been trading at a low of $11. Its stock has dipped to $10.98 today.

As Tricia Duryee wrote recently about the fall:

At that price, it is now worth just over $7 billion, down 57 percent since the company went public last November and well off the more than $10 billion it was valued at as tech’s hottest start-up of 2011.

Ironically, Groupon’s current market valuation is actually not much more than the
$6 billion offered for it by search giant Google in late 2010.

The fall of Groupon has been swift, from the honorific of being the fastest-growing company ever to one that cannot keep control of that runaway growth.

That’s perhaps no surprise.

Perhaps most significantly, Groupon went public in just four years, delivering the biggest tech IPO since Google.

The quicksilver move was typical for it. In just two years’ time, the company ballooned from 37 employees to 9,625 and from serving five markets in the U.S. to 175 in North America alone. And that’s leaving out massive expansion abroad. In the past year, Groupon has acquired roughly 17 companies, including many international copycats.

The company also has entered many new segments, expanding from selling lower-priced and simpler deals on restaurants and spas to more complex and pricey arenas, including travel, physical goods and luxury items.

But Groupon is now learning that its original business does not work across just any segment, especially to more discerning customers of its higher-level and more expensive offerings.

In fact, it was those newer and potentially more lucrative markets that forced the company recently to revise the company’s fourth-quarter report
after returns skyrocketed on luxury items, such as Lasik eye surgery.

The problems forced Groupon to lower revenue in the period by $14.3 million and net income by $22.6 million. It is now reporting a wider net loss of $64.9 million on revenue of $492 million, pushing it further away from its goal of profitability.

The company also disclosed at the time that independent auditors had noted “material weakness” in its financial controls. In addition,
The Wall Street Journal reported that the Securities and Exchange Commission was examining Groupon’s revision.

With many companies, investors might have shrugged off such accounting issues, but the impact on the stock has been greater since they are only the latest in a string of similar mistakes at Groupon.

In its pre-IPO period, for example, Groupon was forced to restate revenues after counting both its portion of the revenue and the revenue that goes to the merchant together. It also had to dump a controversial accounting metric that made the company look more profitable than it was, because it did not include important costs, such as critical online marketing expenses to attract new customers.

Those came after the company retracted a statement by Eric Lefkofsky, Groupon’s co-founder and executive chairman, who told Bloomberg in an interview that Groupon would be “wildly profitable.”

At least the wild part was accurate.

Much of the blame for these missteps by Wall Street is being aimed at CEO and co-founder Andrew Mason, the iconoclastic 31-year-old entrepreneur who is largely responsible for defining the company’s culture, as well as Jason Child and Joe Del Preto, the chief financial and accounting officers, respectively.

Child joined the company in December 2010, coming from Amazon, where he held several roles over a 10-year period — including VP of finance, international, and director of investors relations. Prior to joining Amazon, he worked at Arthur Andersen as a certified public accountant.

Del Preto has been Groupon’s chief accounting officer for the past year and, before that, he was the company’s global controller for three months. Before Groupon, he was controller and VP of finance at Echo Global Logistics and also served as controller at InnerWorkings, the same company where Mason was a computer programmer in his early career.

Mason, of course, is the best known and the person most responsible for establishing the company’s whimsical culture and managing — or mismanaging, depending on how you look at it — Groupon’s hard-charging growth.

It will also be up to him to turn it all around, as the company sinks in both value and investor regard. Since the restatement, Mason has said little about how he intends to do that. In February, when Mason concluded Groupon’s first-ever earnings call, he said: “Thanks, guys, this was a lot of fun, and I look forward to many more of these.”

It’s not clear fun will be on the agenda at his next outing on Groupon’s first-quarter call in mid-May.


Groupon Appoints Two Directors to Board Daniel Henry, CFO of American Express, and Robert Bass, Vice Chair of Deloitte

CHICAGO — (BUSINESS WIRE) — Groupon, Inc (http://www.groupon.com) (NASDAQ:GRPN) today announced that Daniel Henry, the chief financial officer of American Express Company and Robert Bass, a vice chairman of Deloitte LLP will join its Board of Directors. Both will serve on the Audit Committee with Audit Chair, Ted Leonsis. Daniel Henry was appointed to the Board on April 26, replacing Howard Schultz, who has stepped down from the Board. Robert Bass will stand for election at the annual stockholder meeting to be held on June 19 following his retirement from Deloitte, replacing Kevin Efrusy, who will not stand for reelection at that time. “With their deep financial, accounting and operational experience, Dan and Bob will provide invaluable expertise to the Board going forward,” said Eric Lefkofsky, Groupon Chairman.

Daniel Henry, 62, has been the Chief Financial Officer of American Express Company since October 2007. Henry is responsible for leading American Express Company’s finance organization and representing American Express to investors, lenders and rating agencies. He has also served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of U.S. Consumer, Small Business and Merchant Services and joined American Express as Comptroller in 1990. Prior to joining American Express, Henry was a partner with Ernst & Young.

Robert Bass, 62, has been a vice chairman of Deloitte LLP since 2006, and a partner in Deloitte since 1982. He will retire from Deloitte on June 2, 2012. Bass has specialized in e-commerce, mergers and acquisitions and SEC filings. At Deloitte, Bass is responsible for all services provided to Forstmann Little and its portfolio companies and is the advisory partner for Blackstone, DIRECTV, McKesson, IMG and CSC. He has also previously been the advisory partner for priceline.com, RR Donnelley, Automatic Data Processing, Community Health Systems and Avis Budget. He is a member of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and the New York and Connecticut State Societies of Certified Public Accountants.

“I’m thrilled to have been a part of Groupon’s development,” said Kevin Efrusy. “The Company is well on its way to becoming the operating system for all local commerce.”

“Howard and Kevin helped guide us on our journey to becoming a public company and I want to thank them and acknowledge their contributions,” said Groupon CEO Andrew Mason.

“During my tenure on the Board, I was impressed by the game-changing opportunities that Groupon has delivered for both merchants and customers on a global scale,” said Howard Schultz. “Groupon has a strong sense of mission and purpose, and as I move on to focus on my other time commitments, I wish them the very best.”

allthingsd.com



To: stockman_scott who wrote (235)5/5/2012 11:03:47 AM
From: Glenn Petersen1 Recommendation  Respond to of 480
 
CTCT is down by 25% since this piece was written (disappointing first quarter results, though not a disaster). The paired trade would have been a disaster. CTCT might be worth a look.

For Investors, a Little-Known Alternative to Groupon

By Karen Weise
Bloomberg BusinessWeek
on April 04, 2012

With Groupon once again in the headlines over questionable accounting, some investors may be hunting a daily-deal investment that doesn’t offer the periodic jolts. Constant Contact ( CTCT) hasn’t gotten as much press as Groupon ( GRPN) competitors like LivingSocial, but it may be getting new attention, with Groupon shares off 27 percent so far this year. In a blog post, Barry Randall, founder of Crabtree Asset Management, called Groupon and Constant Contact a “ pair trade,” a reference to the investing strategy of shorting one company and going long on another in the same sector. (Short interest in Groupon shares is about 60 percent higher than shorting of other Internet companies, as of March 15, according to Bloomberg data.)

If you think you don’t know Constant Contact, think again. The Waltham (Mass.)-based company manages some of the e-mail lists sending newsletters and updates to your in-box on behalf of a local business, nonprofit, or neighborhood association. Constant Contact’s core business of running the back end for these group e-mails, from tracking who opens the PTA newsletter to letting people unsubscribe, made up 88 percent of the company’s $214 million in revenue in 2011. That produces a recurring monthly revenue stream from its 500,000 customers, more than two-thirds of which have fewer than 10 employees. The average Constant Contact client spends $38.22 per customer per month.

The company has been seeking ways to exploit its presence in so many local organizations to move beyond e-mail lists. It’s added new ways for businesses to manage invitations and RSVPs for events and to survey their customers. A year ago it bought BantamLive, which it used to launch a new effort in January to help small businesses run social marketing campaigns on Facebook. After that announcement, investors sent the share price up more than 16 percent, the most since its initial public offering in 2007. The stock has gained 29 percent, to just under $30, this year.

Earlier this year, Constant Contact bought MobManager, which helps businesses handle the back-end administration of daily deals. That let Constant Contact start SaveLocal, its push into the coupon market. “If Groupon is quantity, SaveLocal is quality,” Chief Executive Officer Gail Goodman said at an investor conference on March 5. She said Groupon’s main value to local businesses is access to the daily-deal company’s large e-mail lists, but that Groupon’s list doesn’t necessarily create customer loyalty. SaveLocal’s offering lets small businesses offer deals to their own customer base—via Constant Contact’s e-mail system—and then encourage those customers to share the deals with friends. It also lets the businesses set their own discount for the coupons instead of being forced into the 50 percent deals that are standard on Groupon.

Constant Contact is also looking to build out a mobile platform for businesses. In January, it paid $5.8 million to acquire CardStar, which will eventually let Constant Contact show consumers nearby deals on their mobile phones. Groupon already has those types of apps, but then again, it may also have regulators breathing down its neck.

Weise is a reporter for Bloomberg Businessweek

http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2012-04-04/for-investors-a-little-known-alternative-to-groupon



To: stockman_scott who wrote (235)5/5/2012 11:05:57 AM
From: Glenn Petersen1 Recommendation  Respond to of 480
 
As Wall Street Points Fingers at Groupon, Three Fingers Point Back

by Sarah Lacy
pandodaily
April 3, 3012

Now I know how Goldilocks felt.

About the time Groupon was raising its $1 billion growth round and getting the big endorsement from some of the Valley’s biggest names, I was bringing up all the problems with its haphazard Samwer-poisoned international expansion.

This lead to a lot of tense conversations with some of my best sources. For instance, my long-time friend Brandee Barker, who did PR for Groupon at the time, said of my coverage, “Wow, I’m not sure I’ve ever seen you take such a severe stab at a company.” I humbly disagreed. Given the train wreck of wasted money and lack of accountability for Groupon’s international division, I thought I was pretty fair.

As a consumer, I haven’t exactly had a love affair with the company either. My husband and I have used a Groupon exactly once. And the longer the company is in business, the less relevant the deals are. “I don’t want a massage in Timbuktu, I don’t want a wax, and I don’t want my nails done,” my husband is saying right now, on one of many rants. My nanny just came in the room and added, “Are we complaining about Groupon? They email me way too much, and I don’t care about any of the deals!”

But in the last few days, as Groupon’s stock falls further – just a nickel off its 52-week low in after hours trading today — the Wall Street torches and pitchforks have come out yet again for the company. And I find myself in a strange position. I’m actually defending them. (Sort of.)

First off, I don’t get Andrew Ross Sorkin’s piece yesterday that Groupon is evidence why the JOBS Act is a bad move. He is talking about how the act would lead to more Groupons because of its provisions that ease regulations on investing in sub-$1 billion-in-revenue companies. That would make sense…except for Groupon had revenues of some $1.6 billion in 2011, so that change wouldn’t have made any difference at all. Sorkin makes this point, but continues with the screed nonetheless.

He’s uncharacteristically missing a huge point: The reason most everyone in the Valley was in support of the JOBS act was because it eases of the 500-shareholder rule allowing companies to stay private longer. This would actually prevent more Groupons, because it would allow rapidly growing companies to put off going public as long as possible. It would allow more companies to take the far more conservative Facebook route.

Both Groupon’s rapid revenue escalation and its time to IPO and are key points to what the company has been going through since it went public. Even as a fairly big Groupon critic let me be clear: Most of Groupon’s woes go back to one serious misstep. It went public years too early.

There is no company in the world that goes from zero to $1 billion valuation — the fastest growing ever, gushed Forbes in 2010 — in less than two years without having serious stress fractures, business model questions, and management team issues. None. That’s like a kid growing a foot overnight and not having stretch marks and leg cramps. Even the Valley golden child Facebook had issues two years in.

Think back to how many scandals Facebook has endured over its lifetime: Presumptive founders wanting payouts, privacy scandals, business model difficulties, and many, many iterations of its senior management team. Facebook spent the first few years of its existence shedding full teams of managers, like a snake annually shedding its skin, until finally it hit on the right team to lead a $100 billion company. Facebook waited for it all to come out of the closet and for all its internal issues to get solved before it invited public shareholders to the party.

I’m not saying Groupon, with five or so more years as a private company, would magically turn into Facebook, far from it. But one way or another the mess of Groupon would have been sorted out with a little more dignity for the people genuinely working hard to build that company.

Rest assured, Facebook going public two years in would most certainly have been a disaster. It just wasn’t ready. No company that grows that fast and establishes an entirely new market along the way is. Mark Zuckerberg most certainly wasn’t ready as a CEO. And — duh! – that’s why it didn’t file.

This is what bothers me about so many Wall Street-minded people like Sorkin, now holding up Groupon as a poster child of the tech startup world’s excess and over-promises: Wall Street has no one to blame but itself.

Since the dot com bust, Wall Street firms have been aggressively lobbying every single fast-growing private company to go public as soon as possible. Facebook has withstood the pressure since at least 2008. Sorkin himself detailed the wild-eyed enthusiasm with which firms pitched Groupon over the summer, desperate to take it public, in his words missing all sorts of the “red flags” in their zeal. Recently the Wall Street Journal did a bizarre post essentially calling Twitter a laggard for not being in a bigger hurry.

LinkedIn, Twitter (so far), and Facebook were all smart enough not to listen to the cheesy bulge-bracket pitch and took their time. Maybe it was greed and maybe it was naiveté, but Groupon wasn’t. But that doesn’t mean it’s an “Emperor Has No Clothes” company that was actively trying to pull the wool over potential investors eyes. It just had serious problems that it should have figured out while still private.

Desperate to invest in private companies while they’re still in early hyper growth? This is what you get, Wall Street. You can’t have it both ways.

http://pandodaily.com/2012/04/03/as-wall-street-points-fingers-at-groupon-three-fingers-point-back/



To: stockman_scott who wrote (235)5/12/2012 4:12:05 AM
From: Glenn Petersen1 Recommendation  Respond to of 480
 
GRPN reports Monday. A preview:

Forbes Earnings Preview: Groupon

By Narrative Science
Forbes
5/10/2012 @ 2:51PM

Groupon
(GRPN) is sitting right above its 52-week low of $9.82 per share. Groupon tries to get away from that mark when it reports its first quarter earnings on Monday, May 14, 2012.

What to Expect:

The consensus estimate is down from three months ago when it was 5 cents, but is unchanged over the past month. Analysts are projecting a loss of 5 cents per share for the fiscal year.

Analysts look for revenue to decrease 17.7% year-over-year to $530.8 million for the quarter, after being $644.7 million a year ago. For the year, revenue is projected to roll in at $2.34 billion.

Analyst Ratings:

The majority of analysts think investors should stand pat on Groupon, with 11 of 19 analysts rating it hold. Analyst sentiment has waned during the last three months.

Recent Price Movement:

The stock price has fallen 52.1% since February 10, 2012, from $21.03 to $10.07.

Earnings estimates provided by Zacks.

Narrative Science, through its proprietary artificial intelligence platform, transforms data into stories and insights.

forbes.com



To: stockman_scott who wrote (235)5/15/2012 10:12:24 AM
From: Glenn Petersen1 Recommendation  Respond to of 480
 
GRPN up 18% yesterday and another 20% this morning.

The 10-Q:

sec.gov

Groupon jumps as results beat estimates

Daily-deals firm issues revenue forecast that tops Street targets


May 14, 2012
Dan Gallagher, MarketWatch

SAN FRANCISCO (MarketWatch) — Groupon Inc. reported better-than-expected revenue for its first quarter on Monday, along with a strong forecast that juiced the company’s shares in after-hours trading.

Shares of Groupon (US:GRPN) jumped nearly 18% late following the results, as adjusted earnings for the period narrowly beat Wall Street’s estimates. The stock already had surged by more than 18% to close at $11.73 during the regular session, after bouncing off an all-time low last week. Read First Take on Groupon results

The daily-deals provider also offered a revenue forecast for the second quarter that came in above analysts’ forecasts.

They’re definitely seeing a relief rally here,” said Aaron Kessler of Raymond James.

For the quarter ended March 31, Groupon reported a net loss of $11.7 million, or 2 cents a share, compared with a net loss of $146.5 million or 48 cents a share for the same period last year. On a non-GAAP basis, the company said it would have earned $16.3 million, or 2 cents a share, for the recent period.

Revenue jumped 89% to $559.3 million. Analysts were expecting adjusted earnings of 1 cent per share on revenue of $530.6 million, according to consensus estimates from Thomson Reuters.

Groupon said operating cash flow surged by 367% to $83.7 million. Free cash flow was $70.6 million for the period. Gross billings rose by 103% to $1.35 billion.

Overall costs grew by 26% during the quarter, though marketing costs fell by nearly 50% compared to the same period last year.

Selling and administrative expenses jumped; Groupon hired more than 1,000 workers during the period to bring its total headcount to 12,548 by the end of the quarter.

The results came in ahead of the company own guidance. On March 30, Groupon revised its fourth-quarter results to account for changes in the way it reserves for customer refunds. It also said its auditor added a “material weakness” warning to its financial statements as a result of the issue.

That warning set off a slide for the company’s stock, which already had lost most of its gains following its IPO in early November 2011.

During the company’s earnings call on Monday afternoon, Groupon CFO Jason Childs said the company is adding staff and capabilities to its financial arm to address the weakness, but that “we still have some more work to do there.”

“Hopefully, within the next quarter or two, we will have done all the steps necessary,” to address the weakness, Childs said, though he added that the matter will not be reviewed by the company’s auditors until the end of the year.

The company predicted revenue in the range of $550 million and $590 million for the second quarter. Analysts had been expecting revenue of $558.7 million.

articles.marketwatch.com



To: stockman_scott who wrote (235)6/1/2012 12:16:25 PM
From: Glenn Petersen1 Recommendation  Respond to of 480
 
Lock-up over, Groupon shares tumble 9%

By Wailin Wong
Tribune reporter
10:44 AM CDT, June 1, 2012


GRPN data by YCharts

Shares of Groupon Inc. are tanking in mid-day trade, reflecting heavy selling as restrictions on insider sales of stock are lifted.

The stock was tumbling 9 percent, or 97 cents, to $9.67 per share. Earlier in the session, it hit a 52-week low of $9.53.

Today marks the end of the company's lock-up period, which prevented insiders from unloading their Groupon stock. Groupon went public in November with a small float. The expiration of the lock-up period puts into play 600 million shares, amounting to 93 percent of the company's total outstanding shares. About one-third of those shares will not be sold, as they are in the hands of co-founders Andrew Mason, Eric Lefkofsky and Brad Keywell. Mason, who is also chief executive, said last month that the trio had no intention of selling their holdings.

Analysts had said they expected downward pressure on Groupon's shares as a result of the lock-up expiration but that many insiders -- a group that includes current and former senior executives, board members and early investors -- would hang onto their stock to wait for a rebound in the price. While Groupon's shares rebounded last month after the company reported first-quarter earnings, they remained well below their IPO price of $20.

Groupon was also seeing heavy trading volume on Friday, with 11.6 million shares traded, compared with an average of 4.46 million in the last 30 trading days.

Other technology companies that have recently gone public also saw significant declines in their stock price when their lock-up period. According to an analysis by Susquehanna Financial Group, the average price of LinkedIn's shares in the week after its lock-up expiration was down 10 percent from the week before it ended. Angie's List saw a 7 percent decline in average share price.

Companies that go public often sign lock-up agreements with their IPO underwriters to help ensure that the stock price remains relatively stable. Lock-ups generally last for 180 days, although Groupon extended its period for another month after having to restate its fourth-quarter and full-year earnings in March.

wawong@tribune.com | Twitter @VelocityWong

Copyright © 2012, Chicago Tribune

chicagotribune.com



To: stockman_scott who wrote (235)6/1/2012 9:36:07 PM
From: Glenn Petersen2 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 480
 
Behind Groupon's $6 Billion Brushoff

Wall Street Journal
Updated June 1, 2012, 8:45 p.m. ET

Adapted from "Groupon's Biggest Deal Ever," by Frank Sennett, to be published by St. Martin's Press on June 5. ©2012 by Frank Sennett.



If you believe the rumored numbers, it would have been the biggest acquisition in Internet history—and you definitely should believe the numbers. In the fall of 2010, search giant offered nearly $6 billion to buy Groupon, the daily-deals site that became the quickest firm to rack up $1 billion in sales and the second-quickest, behind video behemoth YouTube, to hit a $1 billion valuation.

Online acquisitions didn't get any bigger than this.

Andrew Mason, the inexperienced CEO hiding a brilliant analytical mind behind a goofball demeanor, turned 30 on Oct. 22 in the midst of dismissing interest from Yahoo. A few weeks later, Google came calling.

Groupon was starting to enter a period of hyper-growth, increasing pressure on Google to raise its bid, which at that point had reached $3 billion. But the prospect of a sale was tantalizing to both Groupon's leadership and its venture-capital investors.

On Nov. 22, Groupon chairman and co-founder Eric Lefkofsky told then-COO Rob Solomon to grab some clean underwear: They were going to California to salvage the deal. They left with that afternoon in a chartered jet from Chicago's Midway Airport to San Jose.

Mason at that point was seven years out of Northwestern University, where he had majored in music. At six-foot-four, he struck some in Silicon Valley as a taller, more cherubic version of the comedian Dane Cook. When Mason wasn't intensely focused on solving a business problem, he could disarm even the harshest critic with a warmhearted grin that crinkled his eyelids.

He was highly guarded about his personal life and emotions, which sometimes made him come across as cold to those who reported to him. But Mason was always willing to make himself physically vulnerable for the sake of a comedy bit, such as cultivating bizarre sideburns and performing a boot-scooting boogie as the cowboy-hatted pitchman for a monkey-rental service Groupon rolled out one April Fools' Day.

Rumpled clothing and unkempt hair gave him a perennial Sunday-morning-in-the-dorm vibe. In fact, he briefly experimented with sleeping in his clothes so he could wake up a bit later in the morning. And he was so committed to defying the business world's superficial rules of behavior and appearance that he once showed up to lunch with a billionaire decked out in a bright-green tracksuit.

Lefkofsky had already successfully taken other Web companies public, most notably InnerWorkings and Echo Global Logistics, both of which helped other businesses find efficiencies in their supply chains. Half a head shorter than Mason, Lefkofsky had something of a bantamweight boxer's aspect. He was a trim, youthful 42, and with his dark bushy eyebrows, ever-present glasses, he looked a bit like Groucho Marx without the greasepaint.

The meeting consisted largely of both sides telling each other how great this partnership would be. After observing the niceties, Lefkofsky, Mason, and Solomon were invited into a conference room with a whiteboard, where they negotiated for more than two hours with Google officials until they reached a number—the magic $5.75 billion—that they felt comfortable taking back to Groupon's board.

Around 9 p.m. Mason, Lefkofsky, and Solomon returned to the Rosewood Sand Hill, a luxury hotel in Menlo Park on Sand Hill Road, the fabled street of dreams for seekers of venture capital in Silicon Valley. The trio retired to Madera, the Rosewood restaurant where many a high-tech deal is sealed and celebrated. It was just before closing time, and they had the place all to themselves.

It was a giddy, potentially historic moment. They were heading back to the Midwest in the morning with an astonishing offer for a team of Chicago upstarts who had started fleshing out the idea for a group-buying site just a few years earlier.

The trio finished their drinks and, warmed by the glow of the restaurant's large fireplace, contemplated futures growing brighter by the moment.

Only one significant hurdle remained: Google couldn't guarantee the deal would close. The company did offer a sky-high $800 million breakup fee, but if antitrust concerns held up the sale for a year to 18 months—and perhaps ultimately led the Justice Department to quash the deal—that would be cold comfort for Groupon. In the worst case, the Chicago company could be crippled.

After the last California trip, Mason and Lefkofsky initiated several tension-packed board calls from Groupon headquarters. The conversations, some of which took place on weekends as the sense of urgency grew, centered around a simple yet exceedingly difficult-to-answer question: Would it be absolutely nuts to turn down this deal?

Groupon had cracked a code the Silicon Valley giants had failed repeatedly to solve: It had hooked local merchants up to a giant e-commerce machine and then delivered the resulting bargains directly to millions of consumers world-wide. Executed properly, this could be one of those once-every-decade business breakthroughs, perhaps on a par with Amazon's creation of an online-only retail superstore in the 90s.

As the biggest technology firm in the world, Google could provide Groupon with key advantages. Integrating daily deals into the dominant online search product could rapidly increase the reach of those offers. And Google's respectful post-acquisition management of YouTube suggested Groupon's team would be able to operate as a truly autonomous business unit, an impression Google did everything it could to reinforce.

So the model worked, in theory. But some of Groupon's key players, Mason chief among them, had the nagging sense that YouTube had sold itself too early. And even though the offer was nearly four times as large as the one that landed YouTube, the Chicago crew couldn't shake the feeling that they still might be cashing out too soon.

As the negotiations dragged on, most of the board came around to supporting the sale. But there were a few key voices, such as board member Kevin Efrusy—the man who had led Accel Partners' investment in Facebook —pushing to see how far Groupon could go on its own. Efrusy was joined in the pro-independence camp by board observer Roger Lee, general partner of VC firm Battery Ventures, another Groupon investor.

By the second half of 2011, less than a year later, Groupon's gross billings actually topped $400 million a month.

By early December, it was time to make a decision. Solomon was fond of telling colleagues that if they turned down the largest deal ever offered to an Internet start-up, they'd ultimately look like either the biggest idiots in the world or the guys with the biggest b—.

Toward the end of the process, Mason brought in Nitin Sharma, a data scientist who worked for Groupon, to make a presentation. Sharma had crunched the numbers and, based on his jaw-dropping projections, Groupon could end up more than 10 times larger if it fully optimized its data processes. He strongly recommended that the company remain independent.

That is when everyone started climbing down off the fence. Lefkofsky was neurotic enough that he might not sleep for the next 18 months if antitrust concerns held up the Google deal, and now these new projections supported the Groupon founders' gut feeling that they had a lot of running room left with this still largely unexploited commerce model.

In the six weeks during which the Yahoo and Google negotiations played out, the company's sales had exploded to some $50 million a month, twice what they had been just three months earlier.

The leadership team started wondering if gross revenues in 2011 might top $1 billion, or even $2 billion. It was hard to project how steep the curve might be. The most successful Groupon to date, a Nov. 24, 2010, Nordstrom Rack deal that sold $50 gift cards for $25 and grossed more than $15.6 million (representing about 2.5% of Groupon's cumulative total sales up to that time), pointed toward strong continued growth on the national retail front.

Add in the fact that international sales were exploding and now accounted for more than half of the company's revenue. Staying independent started to seem almost irresistible.

Mason and Lefkofsky holed up in a Groupon conference room and talked the proposed deal through one last time. They now believed their company was worth well more than $6 billion, but it was difficult to say precisely how much more—unless they chose to believe leaks from New York investment bankers who pegged Groupon's valuation at anywhere from $20 billion to $30 billion.

That overheated speculation emerged as competition between Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs for lead underwriter status became so intense that Goldman CEO Lloyd Blankfein scheduled a visit to Groupon headquarters for two weeks into the new year so that Blankfein, one of banking's true masters of the universe, could pitch Mason and Lefkofsky in person.

Ultimately, they concluded the company had so much growth potential, and they were so passionate about the business model, that the only move left was to call Google on Dec. 3 and kill the deal—a deal that likely would have been done if only the search giant had been able to guarantee a close.

"Emerging from that process, it felt like a butterfly emerging from the cocoon," Mason said. "We went through a period of introspection and self-doubt, and then ultimately emerged in a state of supreme confidence. Like, OK, we're the best company in the world."

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702303640104577440580610986086.html?mod=googlenews_wsj



To: stockman_scott who wrote (235)7/1/2012 9:35:50 AM
From: Glenn Petersen1 Recommendation  Respond to of 480
 
Groupon challenged as loyalty startups grab investor cash

By Olga Kharif
Bloomberg News
2:13 AM CDT, July 1, 2012

New York City baker Eileen Avezzano says she has a better way than Groupon's online deals to entice customers to buy her cheesecakes again: She doles out loyalty cards that reward buyers for return visits.

The cards, designed by Cartera Commerce, are digital instead of physical, and are linked to credit cards consumers already use. They let merchants provide a discount, or a reward such as airline miles, every time consumers buy. A shopper may swipe a card, and a retailer will automatically deduct some money off the bill.

Businesses such as Avezzano's can use the programs to collect data on when customers shop, how often they return and how much they spend," way beyond the scope of old-fashioned paper punch cards. That can make them even more valuable than coupons from Groupon and LivingSocial. About 900 million transactions will be conducted with cards connected to merchant loyalty programs in 2015, generating $1.7 billion in revenue for the providers, Aite Group estimates. That's up from $300 million in 2011.

"I see them going head-to-head," said Peter Krasilovsky, a vice president at researcher BIA/Kelsey. "It's an evolution of the deals space. The goal is to go beyond new customer acquisitions and become part of the integrated business of merchants."

The digital loyalty program market began exploding around 2010, when startups and venture capitalists starting thinking about how to bring loyalty punch cards into the digital age, Krasilovsky said. Makers of loyalty-card software have attracted more than $155 million in venture capital.

Cartera raised $12.2 million this month in a round of funding led by Venture Capital Fund of New England. Along with Cartera, startups such as Plink, CardSpring and Mirth are gaining attention in the world of merchant deals.

"We think it's a massive opportunity," said Jeffrey Bussgang, a general partner at Cartera investor Flybridge Capital Partners. "Card-linked marketing benefits card issuers and consumers equally."

These loyalty programs, which reward buyers on top of any airline miles or points their credit cards already offer, are often cheaper than coupon providers, too. LivingSocial and Groupon, the biggest provider of daily discounts, typically take a 30 percent cut of a transaction, versus 5 percent to 15 percent when a loyalty-linked card is used. The competition adds to concerns facing Groupon, whose shares have tumbled 51 percent since its initial public offering in November.

Some loyalty programs let consumers get rewards of their choice such as cash back, discounts or virtual currency for games like Zynga's FarmVille. American Express's Zynga Serve Rewards card allows fans to amass the currency when they shop and use it for the online game.

Virtual currencies are seen as a way to attract people in their 20s, said Ron Shevlin, a senior analyst at Aite.

"Zynga has a large portion of players who are highly engaged in their games," said David Messenger, executive vice president of online and mobile for American Express. "We can connect that online engagement with offline behavior."

Plink, a Denver, Colo.-based startup, has designed a loyalty program that lets users earn Facebook's virtual currency by dining at more than 25,000 restaurants such as Burger King Corp. and Outback Steakhouse. CardSpring allows clients to build their own Web-based and mobile applications for cards that can deliver coupons, digital receipts and loyalty programs.

Mirth, whose program is in trials in New York, rewards frequent customers with a 3 percent discount on purchases whenever they swipe their cards at participating restaurants.

"A lot of merchants have voiced their frustration with deep discounts and deals," said Jeremy Galen, Mirth's chief executive officer. "With us, you don't have to lower your price."

On June 19, online-payments startup Square also introduced a loyalty program, letting small businesses offer rewards to customers who swipe credit cards through its handheld readers.

Increased competition may further damp analysts' expectations for Groupon. The Chicago-based company in March reported a "material weakness" in its financial controls and said fourth-quarter results were worse than previously stated because of higher refunds to merchants.

A survey earlier this year by Susquehanna Financial Group and daily-deal aggregator Yipit showed that about half of businesses that had offered an online deal-of-the-day weren't planning to do so again in the following six months. Merchants were concerned about a low rate of repeat business from new customers gained through such offers, the survey found.

As a result, Groupon's IPO has been among the worst market debuts for a Web company since the dot-com crash. Closely held LivingSocial, whose backers include Amazon.com, Lightspeed Venture Partners and AOL founder Steve Case, doesn't disclose sales or earnings figures.

Both LivingSocial and Groupon have started their own loyalty programs. LivingSocial introduced its first co-branded credit card with JPMorgan Chase & Co. in May. Cardholders can earn points that can be converted into DealBucks and used toward LivingSocial deals.

Groupon's Rewards program, which gives consumers points for shopping at participating companies with a registered credit card, was rolled out nationwide at the end of the first quarter.

"We are signing up hundreds of merchants every week, and have hundreds of thousands of customers on this platform," said Jay Hoffman, vice president and general manager of the Rewards program. "The adoption has been incredible."

Still, some business owners view rival loyalty programs as a better investment than daily deals.

"With Groupon, it's a one-time offer," it doesn't last," New York baker Avezzano said. Customer numbers at Eileen's Special Cheesecake have jumped 18 percent since the shop started using Cartera's loyalty technology a year ago, she said.

chicagotribune.com



To: stockman_scott who wrote (235)7/8/2012 2:16:29 PM
From: Glenn Petersen2 Recommendations  Respond to of 480
 
Groupon Crashes To A New Low...

Henry Blodget
Business Insider
Jul. 6, 2012, 3:42 PM



Remember when Groupon went public at $20 a share?

That was a long, long time ago.

(Well, actually, it was about 8 months ago).

In any event, now you can pick some up for less than $8.50 a share.

The company is valued at about $5 billion now, which seems pretty fair.

That's about 2X this year's revenue, which is still growing at an impressive clip over last year. And the company's operations are
profitable, both on an income statement and cash-flow basis.

And if Groupon's business works over the long haul, which I still think it will, it's a lot easier to get a decent return from this valuation than the one it went public at ($16 billion or something).

So, believe it or not, Groupon risk/reward here looks like it's getting pretty attractive.

businessinsider.com



To: stockman_scott who wrote (235)7/11/2012 4:19:56 PM
From: Glenn Petersen1 Recommendation  Respond to of 480
 
Drip, drip, drip. . .

Groupon shares hit new low on Europe concern

Citi analyst cuts Groupon price target, lowers Groupon 2013 profit estimate

Reuters
1:23 p.m. CDT, July 11, 2012

Groupon Inc. shares hit a record low on concerns about economic weakness in Europe, where the leading online daily deal company gets about one-quarter of its revenue, analysts said on Wednesday.

Groupon was down 5.5 percent to $7.85 during afternoon trading on Wednesday after hitting a record low of $7.72.

"Europe is a concern obviously," said Sameet Sinha, an analyst at B. Riley & Co.

Citi Research analyst Mark Mahaney cut his price target on Groupon shares to $19 from $22 in an Internet earnings preview note that came out late Tuesday.

The cut in the price target was driven by a reduction in Mahaney's estimate for Groupon's 2013 earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, or EBITDA. He now expects Groupon to record EBITDA of $718 million in 2013, down from a previous estimate of about $930 million.

The lower estimate was partly driven by concerns about potential economic weakness and currency volatility in Europe.

"European exposure in particular is an issue" for several Internet stocks, including Google Inc, Amazon.com Inc , eBay Inc, LinkedIn Corp, Priceline.com Inc and Groupon, Mahaney wrote in the note to investors.

For Groupon, which is expected to report second-quarter results in late July or early August, "changing foreign exchange trends and still uncertain macro conditions will likely moderate potential upside to Street estimates," Mahaney wrote.

Groupon gets about 45 percent of revenues from international businesses, including about 25 percent from Europe, the analyst noted.

"We will expect Groupon management to provide commentary related to still lingering macro-economic weakness and volatility in both the U.S. and Europe," Mahaney added in the note. (



GRPN data by YCharts

Copyright © 2012, Reuters

chicagotribune.com



To: stockman_scott who wrote (235)7/17/2012 4:01:43 PM
From: Glenn Petersen1 Recommendation  Respond to of 480
 
GRPN is down today on news that LivingSocial has broadened its business modeL

LivingSocial Launches E-Commerce, a Business Worth $200 Million a Year

Tricia Duryee
All Things D
July 17, 2012 at 10:10 am PT

Today, LivingSocial officially announced its first foray into selling physical products.

LivingSocial Shop is similar to the company’s original business, in that it will send an email to consumers, offering a limited set of products at a discount.

But unlike the rest of the Washington, D.C.-based business, which sells vouchers that are redeemed at spas and restaurants, these products will be delivered right to a customer’s door.

LivingSocial, which is owned partially by Amazon, has been experimenting with e-commerce in Cincinnati for weeks, and according to Yipit, which tracks sales across hundreds of daily deals providers, it could potentially be worth $200 million on an annual basis, once it officially goes live.

Here’s how Yipit did the math: It said LivingSocial tested 15 product offers over several weeks in Cincinnati, which earned $39,000. It estimates that once those offers are opened up to the company’s entire subscriber base, and assuming LivingSocial doubles the number of products for sale to 30, the business will ramp quickly to a projected $187 million in annual revenue.

To be sure, LivingSocial and Groupon have found it fairly easy to launch new categories, although not all are successful right out of the gate. But it helps that both have a subscriber base of folks happy to check out the latest discounts. Groupon launched an e-commerce service last year called Groupon Goods, and Yipit estimates that Goods already makes up 10 percent of the company’s North American business.

In slight contrast to what Groupon is doing, LivingSocial said the products it will be selling will be connected by a theme. For example, today’s theme is “Beach Bound,” and items for sale include water-resistant blanket and totes, water bottles, towels, beach toys and a collapsible gazebo.

allthingsd.com



To: stockman_scott who wrote (235)7/22/2012 8:42:12 AM
From: Glenn Petersen  Respond to of 480
 
The Education of Groupon CEO Andrew Mason

By Lauren Etter and Douglas MacMillan
Bloomberg Businessweek
on July 12, 2012

There’s an excellent Japanese restaurant in Chicago’s Wicker Park neighborhood. The place has been around for years and still draws a crowd, a trendy mix of tattooed hipsters and business-casual professionals. Black-clad waiters with spiky hair shuttle plates of sashimi, which is pricey but worth it, judging from the reviews on Yelp. On weekend nights, customers might be directed to their tables by the most absurdly overqualified maitre d’ on earth: Andrew Mason, who is also the chief executive officer and founder of Groupon ( GRPN).

“In addition to actually greeting customers as they come in,” says Mason, “I’m running between the front of the house, where we have one system, and the back of the house, where we have another system, entering redundant data from one into the other. I’m just managing the mess that is this technology infrastructure for the business.”

Mason says his hosting gig, which he agreed to discuss on the condition that the establishment not be named, helps him understand what makes local merchants tick—how they book reservations, accept payments, and manage inventory. It’s all the stuff businesses do behind the scenes. It’s also, he says, the future of Groupon. Mason co-founded the company in 2008 as a website for selling marked-down spa packages and half-off pizza. Just four years later, it’s a 12,500-employee public company that e-mails daily deals—on everything from 43 percent-off Android tablets to discounted beekeeping classes—to 36 million customers in 48 countries. Mason built his empire by persuading retailers and restaurant owners to offer deals, but he’s rethinking what a tech company can offer such businesses, and a good way to understand them is to work at one. “I didn’t realize how hard it was to run a small business,” he says.

A Mason skeptic, and there are a great many, might say he doesn’t know how to run a large business either. Groupon has gone from “Fastest Growing Company Ever,” as Forbes magazine once called it, to Wall Street whipping boy. The business model is under siege from daily deals offered by competitors such as Google ( GOOG), Amazon.com ( AMZN), Yelp ( YELP), and LivingSocial, and merchants complain that Groupon brings in deal hunters, not repeat customers. “The demand for deals has cooled,” says Greg Sterling, a senior analyst with Opus Research. Since its initial public offering last November, Groupon’s stock has lost more than half its value.



Exacerbating that downward trend has been Mason’s reputation for being something of a goofball. Groupon has blundered through a series of accounting restatements, public gaffes, and shareholder lawsuits. The CEO often looked like he’d just gotten out of bed and seemed more dedicated to maintaining a comical vibe than running a company. Groupon hired actual stand-up comedians to write the prose for its daily deals. In Groupon’s Chicago main office, which used to be Montgomery Ward’s headquarters, staffers famously created and maintained a furnished living space called Michael’s Room. The gag was that the resident was a fictional “monstrous manchild” named Michael who was said to be a descendant of Aaron Montgomery Ward.

Over breakfast at Yolk, a café about half a mile from Groupon’s offices, Mason, 31, is looking a lot less scruffy these days. His hair is neatly parted to the right, and he’s wearing tortoise-shell glasses and a crisp light-blue dress shirt with a pen in the pocket. “We’ve clearly had some rockiness surrounding being a public company,” he says, carefully rolling up his sleeves as he tucks into his eggs and toast. “But we’ve learned our lesson, and we’re moving on.”

As Mason never tires of reminding people, local commerce is huge: Americans spend hundreds of billions a year in restaurants and stores, according to the U.S. Department of Commerce. He sees Main Street as one of the last remaining areas of the economy not yet consumed by the Internet. As they have for decades, customers walk in, shop, and pay with cash or credit card. The tools at a merchant’s disposal are mostly limited to a handwritten or computer booking system, a credit-card processing machine, and a cash register, all of which tend to work independently. “They have a point-of-sale system that doesn’t talk to their reservation system that doesn’t talk to their online ordering system,” Mason says. “Each one of the solutions provided to them they loathe so deeply that they don’t even get around to wishing that they were all integrated.”

It’s easy to forget how ingenious Mason’s business model was in 2008. Consumers couldn’t get enough of Groupon’s daily deals. Initially, “there was an interest in trying to create everything in Chicago,” says Rob Solomon, the company’s former chief operating officer. He says that around two years ago, Mason made a trip to the West Coast. After Solomon squired Mason around to meet with industry luminaries such as Mike Schroepfer, Facebook’s ( FB) head of engineering, it became apparent to Mason that Groupon “would have to have a base in Silicon Valley to recruit the best and the brightest,” Solomon says.

Mason’s interest in Valley companies was reciprocated—especially by Google, which offered to buy Groupon for about $6 billion in November 2010. After weeks of negotiating, Mason walked away, and he’s still trying to live down the decision. People thought he was crazy. “Just about every person on the planet … really did think you lost it,” 60 Minutes correspondent Lesley Stahl told him on air. During a segment on National Public Radio, Dartmouth College professor Sydney Finkelstein ranked Mason one of the “worst CEOs of 2010”—along with former BP ( BP) CEO Tony Hayward—for leaving so much cash on the table. “Life is not about money,” Mason says. “The reason that we made a decision to be an independent company is we quite simply wanted control of our destiny. We wanted the ability to make big bets and take smart risks and go after what we saw as a big opportunity.”

Saying no to billions of dollars meant that Groupon had to prove to investors that its calculation, while risky, was right. The surest way to do that was to take the company public. In June 2011, Groupon filed for an IPO. It would go on to raise $700 million at a valuation of $12.7 billion.

The company immediately came under intense pressure. Back when it was a startup, the incessant jokiness seemed like a useful marketing gimmick. Antics like Michael’s Room came off as charming or, at worst, harmlessly daft. As Groupon prepared to go public, though, potential investors—and government regulators—weren’t laughing.

Groupon’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission showed that the company was losing a lot of money. “I can’t recall ever seeing such negative investor sentiment about a company,” says Mark May, director of equity research at Barclays Capital ( BCS), who has covered the Internet since the 1990s. “It was very hard to find investors that were positive.”

Mason’s college-kid demeanor probably didn’t help during the road show for investors. Between meetings with bankers, Mason, a self-professed video game junkie, played a game called Whale Trail on his iPhone. In the game, the player navigates a cheerful flying whale named Willow through a psychedelic sky while trying to gobble rainbow-colored bubbles and avoid black clouds that do the bidding of the evil Baron Von Barry. “It’s a good game for just tuning out,” Mason says. Laughing, he adds, “It was just featured on iTunes as one of the best games for four- to six-year-olds.”

Things didn’t improve much for Groupon after its IPO. On Feb. 8, the company posted its first public earnings, showing a net loss of $42.7 million. The following month it had to revise its earnings, saying that the number of refunds for coupons was higher than previously estimated. The revision lowered fourth-quarter 2011 revenue by $14.3 million, while net income was lower by $22.7 million. Groupon’s shares slid lower in the following weeks and was trading at around $8.30 on July 10. The company’s market value is about $5.4 billion, or $600 million less than Google’s offer in 2010.

Peter Barris, a Groupon board member and investor in the company through venture capital firm New Enterprise Associates, says the board stands by Mason. “No question about it,” he says. “Andrew has developed into an excellent CEO. Has he had some stumbles? He has admitted ‘yes.’ Does he have lessons to learn? Yes.”

Mason held a companywide town hall meeting in April. With a bottle of beer in hand, he casually told his daily-deal foot soldiers that Groupon was getting a reputation for “how bad we are at being a public company,” according to an account in the Wall Street Journal. Mason declared it was time for the company, which he called a “toddler in a grown man’s body,” to grow up.

“We have to get good at this,” he said.

He choked up a little, and apologized: “Sorry, too much beer.”

The mood at Groupon is more subdued now. “You’ve seen the seriousness level notch up, across the board,” says Rich Williams, Groupon’s senior vice president of global marketing. “We have a lot more accountants and lawyers.” The light was turned off in Michael’s Room during a recent visit, and people who know Mason say he makes fewer jokes.

The CEO’s focus now is on building what Mason calls the “operating system for local commerce”—a suite of software and technology services that would embed Groupon into every facet of every transaction on Main Street. Mason envisions consumers using Groupon as a kind of Yellow Pages to search for new ideas on where to dine or where to find the lowest prices offered by thousands of local businesses. Merchants would use the system not only as a form of advertising but also as a touch point for every sale they ring up and a hook for bringing customers back.

The daily deal has enabled Groupon to build a network of relationships with millions of customers and hundreds of thousands of merchants. But the appeal has started to fade. Consumers don’t always have the time or wherewithal to plan ahead, buy a deal, print it out, and redeem it a few days later. And if a deal is a hit with subscribers, the ensuing wave of customers has been known to overwhelm merchants. That’s why Mason’s thinking about the value of the daily deal is evolving. “Right now, we’re just this advertising solution,” Mason says. “If we can come up with an ecosystem that local merchants use to run their business and it’s connected to consumers, then I think that’s a pretty sizable business.”

Mason’s plan is taking shape inside a large warehouse in Palo Alto, Calif. There, more than 300 programmers and designers work on software products including Groupon Scheduler, an online appointment-booking system; Groupon Now!, a mobile app for posting and perusing deals on the go; and Groupon Rewards, a loyalty program that uses customers’ credit-card numbers to track and reward purchases.

The effort is being led by Jeff Holden, a former Amazon executive who started a company Groupon bought last year called Pelago—it made a mobile check-in service that let smartphone users broadcast their location and activities to friends. Holden is based in Chicago but makes frequent trips to California to interview potential hires and hold tech-focused meetings. “Over time, our relationship with merchants will shift from being episodic in nature to a completely perpetual relationship where they’ll plug in their business into the Groupon operating system and the right thing will happen,” he says.

His team’s first attempts at this model are on display in hundreds of restaurants and boutiques around the country, where merchants are trying out Groupon’s tech products and giving the company feedback. At Cowabunga Creamery, a surfing-themed ice cream parlor in the sleepy suburb of San Carlos, Calif., customers have their credit cards swiped through a plastic scanner attached to an iPad. Groupon developed the device with hardware maker Infinite Peripherals and built a cash register app for the iPad. “This becomes your business computer,” says Bill Cotter, Cowabunga’s owner. With his previous credit-card processor, Cotter says he would have to keep track of receipts and manually add up his daily income to calculate tax at the end of the month. “This does all that,” says Cotter, who has never run a daily deal on Groupon’s site. There are about 500 merchants in the San Francisco Bay area testing the payment system, according to a partner involved in the trial run who asked not to be named because the details aren’t public.

This year, Groupon plans to add hundreds of workers to its Palo Alto operation. Much of the office is stocked with entrepreneurs and small tech teams from the 30-plus startups Groupon acquired, such as mobile app developer Mob.ly and social networking service Campfire Labs. Among its new products, the furthest along is Groupon Now, a mobile app that offers spur-of-the-moment deals on shops and restaurants close to the user. It was introduced last year, though it still represents only a “small part of” Groupon’s overall business, Mason said on his latest earnings call.

Groupon Now has been a tough sell. That’s partly because there was a separate sales staff for Groupon Now and the daily deals. Merchants reported being overwhelmed by the duplicate calls they were getting from Groupon staff. Now the company primarily uses the same salesperson to sell both products. Another challenge has been shopper apathy. There just aren’t enough deals available in some places. If you’re a pedestrian in midtown Manhattan, no problem. If you’re in some distant suburb, the pickings are probably slimmer.



Some business owners aren’t sold on Groupon’s new services. Earlier this year, Carlos Kainz signed up for Groupon Rewards, which promised to turn casual patrons of his Seattle restaurant, Dulces Bistro & Wine, into loyal customers. On Groupon’s website, diners supplied their credit-card numbers; those who spent more than $375 on meals at Dulces would get a $50 voucher. “They said it was going to make people return, kind of like a mileage plan,” Kainz, owner of the eatery, says of a Groupon salesperson’s pitch. Six months into the program, Kainz counts the number of customers who unlocked the reward: “Zero.”

Still others don’t trust Groupon to add value to a business that it has little experience in. “I don’t think they’re quite well versed in how a restaurant runs,” says Sarah Shirley, manager of the San Francisco café Back Yard Kitchen. Shirley sells Groupon coupons to get customers in the door, but has no interest in trying out the company’s other services. “It would be too soon to jump on that bandwagon.”

Rick Summer, senior equity analyst at Morningstar ( MORN), says it may be a while before Groupon becomes a kind of Microsoft ( MSFT) Windows for local commerce. “I think it’s absolutely the right vision, but I would equate it to somebody who’s a great tire manufacturer announcing that they are really building an automobile manufacturing plant. There are a lot of things that they are doing that have nothing to do with becoming the operating system for local commerce,” he says, pointing to Groupon’s recent foray into discount travel and live events. “These are things that Groupon clearly has no domain expertise in. Some of this business that they’ve been pursuing is really a high-calorie, high-fructose-corn-syrup way of pursuing business—it’s a diet of easy revenue to show growth.”

Over breakfast at Yolk, Mason concedes that he’ll face formidable competition as he pushes Groupon past daily deals. OpenTable ( OPEN) is dominant in online reservations. It also has a customer loyalty program, as do American Express ( AXP), Visa ( V), Citibank ( C), Amazon.com, and countless other institutions. Google and PayPal ( EBAY) have recently upped their offerings for local merchants; Square, the San Francisco startup founded by Twitter creator Jack Dorsey, has armed retailers with a suite of software that works with the popular Square plastic card swipers for smartphones and tablets.

As for “domain expertise,” that’s what Mason’s restaurant job is about. Besides hosting, he wants to untangle these separate systems and integrate them better. “It’s really firmed up my understanding and cleared my thinking on what a pain point it is that we’re solving,” he says.

At the end of the meal, Mason politely excuses himself to head back to Groupon. With the dress shirt and neat haircut, he even looks like the centi-millionaire CEO that he is. Then he heads out the door, and the impression dissipates. There’s no car and driver waiting for him, just his sage green Vespa. He hops on and rides off into Chicago traffic, without a helmet.

http://www.businessweek.com/printer/articles/61362-the-education-of-groupon-ceo-andrew-mason



To: stockman_scott who wrote (235)7/27/2012 4:50:57 PM
From: Glenn Petersen2 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 480
 
Amazon's Book Value for LivingSocial Declines

By GREG BENSINGER
Wall Street Journal
Updated July 27, 2012, 3:13 p.m. ET

Amazon.com Inc.'s book value of its stake in daily-deals company LivingSocial Inc. has declined, according to regulatory filing Friday.

Amazon put the book value of its 29% stake in LivingSocial at $271 million in the second quarter, down from $298 million in the first quarter, according to the Amazon filing. LivingSocial was valued at $934.5 million in the quarter, after cracking $1 billion in this year's first three months.

The Washington D.C.-based company swung to a second-quarter loss as its expenses mounted. It posted a loss of $93 million in the quarter, compared with a gain of $156 million in the first quarter, due in part to a 16% jump in operating expenses to $234 million, according to the filing.

LivingSocial parted ways this week with a dozen employees, including three executives, as part of a broad reorganization to help it compete with Groupon Inc.

LivingSocial Chief Executive Tim O'Shaughnessy has said the company has no immediate plans to file for an initial public offering in the wake of the rocky IPOs of Facebook Inc. and Groupon.

A LivingSocial spokesman didn't immediately respond to a request for comment.

Write to Greg Bensinger at greg.bensinger@wsj.com

online.wsj.com



To: stockman_scott who wrote (235)10/25/2012 4:35:07 PM
From: Glenn Petersen1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 480
 
AMZN takes a huge hit on its LivingSocial investment:

Amazon Announces A Gigantic Loss On Its LivingSocial Investment

Joe Weisenthal
Business Insider
October 25, 2012

The daily deal bubble continues to burst.

Latest victim Amazon, which invested in LivingSocial, a private competitor of Groupon.

In its just-announced earnings, the company says:

"Net loss was $274 million in the third quarter, or $0.60 per diluted share, compared with net income of $63 million, or $0.14 per diluted share, in third quarter 2011. The third quarter 2012 includes a loss of $169 million, or $0.37 per diluted share, related to our equity-method share of the losses reported by LivingSocial, primarily attributable to its impairment charge of certain assets, including goodwill."

To put that that into perspective, the company invested $175 million in LivingSocial. So basically, complete wipe-out.

Read the full Amazon earnings coverage here >

http://www.businessinsider.com/amazon-announces-loss-on-livingsocial-2012-10



To: stockman_scott who wrote (235)3/3/2013 11:23:42 AM
From: Glenn Petersen2 Recommendations  Respond to of 480
 
Goodbye Groupon: Andrew Mason's dance with the devil An aspiring entrepreneur partners with an experienced operator with a checkered past

By Ben Popper
The Verge
on March 1, 2013 03:49 pm

In the wake of Andrew Mason's firing as CEO of Groupon, there's been a lot of negativity towards the young entrepreneur. In part it's because Mason was always a character, someone who largely refused to take things seriously, and who preferred to defuse tension with humor, as he did in his hilarious resignation letter yesterday. This was charming at first, then increasingly less so as Groupon's financial health, business practices and accounting came into question. But as the smiling face of the fastest-growing company in history, Mason was also a shield, a barrier between the press and Eric Lefkofsky, the co-founder and investor behind Groupon, and a man with a track record of creating hypergrowth companies that have crashed and burned... after he cashed out.

My mother knows who Andrew Mason is — he was the poster boy for Groupon and a frequent presence in the media. Far fewer people, even among tech investors, are familiar with Eric Lefkofsky. That's a shame, because once you become familiar with his history, it's stunningly clear what happened with Groupon.



Groupon stock chart via Yahoo Finance

The best reporting on Lefkofsky comes from this Fortune magazine piece, which was published a few months before Groupon's IPO. It traces his history as a Janus-faced business man, someone known as both "the most successful and prolific internet entrepreneur in Chicago," but also as a man with "a history of busting investors after promising to radically transform bricks-and-mortar industries."

Lefkofsky's first venture was Brandon Apparel, which he himself noted "ended up being a huge failure. We over-leveraged the company and it eventually crumbled under the weight of that debt." It's honest of Lefkofsky to acknowledge his failures, but the closing of Brandon was much messier than that. Lefkofsky was sued by his bank, which won an $11 million judgement, leading Lefkofsky to then sue his law firm for malpractice. The former owner of Brandon also sued, as did the NFL and MLB, and the city which loaned Lefkofsky money to build a new factory.

His next venture, Starbelly, was launched during the heady days of the dot-com boom. Again, Lefkofsky raised a lot of capital, this time taking millions in venture funding. In January of 2000 Starbelly — still less than a year old — was sold to Ha Lo, a 50-year-old company, for $240 million. By the end of that year, Ha Lo had gone from profitability to a huge $64 million loss, largely thanks to $48 million in costs accrued from the acquisition of Starbelly. By 2001 Ha Lo had filed for bankruptcy, and numerous lawsuits were again filed with Lefkofsky's name on them.

Lefkofsky's next two ventures, a print-procurement service called InnerWorkings and a supply chain management firm named Echo Global Logistics, showed that perhaps his ways had changed. Both went public and have remained in business.

But with Groupon, a familiar playbook resurfaced. When Lefkofsky met Mason, the latter was a young, ambitious entrepreneur working on his first company, a crowdfunding platform called The Point that was similar to Kickstarter or IndieGoGo. Lefkofsky saw something in Mason, and gave him several hundred thousand dollars to grow The Point. But after a few months, Lefkofsky became impatient. As Mason told Chicago Magazine, Lefkofsky "started prodding me to figure out how The Point was going to make money." Eventually The Point pivoted to become Groupon, with Mason as the brash young CEO, and Lefkofsky behind the scenes, controlling a huge percentage of the shares and voting rights.

Groupon went on to become the fastest-growing company of all time, hitting a billion dollars in revenue in just 17 months. It followed the Lefkofsky playbook to a T: a hypergrowth company fueled by mountains of investment capital that claimed to be reinventing an old industry — coupons and loyalty cards — with a high-tech approach. In an interview with Bloomberg before the company went public, Lefkofsky claimed Groupon would be "wildly profitable", a statement the SEC later forced him to retract. And while a few journalists raised questions about Lefkofsky's past, most focused instead on the incredible growth and the smiling Andrew Mason, who personified the disruptive youth and innovation of a startup.

Since it went public, the facade of Groupon has come tumbling down. Instead of wild profits, there's been steady losses. And as the red ink has mounted, so have the lawsuits, from investors who said they were misled and from employees who said they weren't paid. The SEC was forced to look into some very fishy accounting which appeared to have been used to prop up Groupon's books. As the bad news piled up, Mason took the brunt of the criticism, with Lefkofsky fading into the background.

With Mason's departure, Lefkofsky will take over as co-CEO, along with vice chairman Ted Leonsis. In some respects that will mean he finally has to face the music. But just like it was with his previous ventures, the health of Groupon's business has less of a material impact on Lefkofsky than many others involved. He and his family actually cashed out to the tune of $382 million before the IPO taking a huge chunk of cash off the table during the last round of venture funding. Insiders cashed out again during the IPO, which valued the company at $12.8 billion. And it wasn't long before talk of a secondary offering, which would allow insiders to cash out for a third time, began to swirl.

In the 16 months since Groupon went public, the stock has plummeted more than 80 percent. It's now worth $3.09 billion, or roughly half what Google offered to pay for it back in 2010. And its most recent earnings, reported yesterday, paint a grim picture, with the company notching losses of 12 cents a share.

Andrew Mason quipped in his goodbye letter that he's taking a break, go to "fat camp", and maybe lose the "Groupon 40", before diving into something new. But as he looks to begin the second phase of his career as an entrepreneur, he will have a reputation to shed. As Mason himself wrote in his goodbye letter:

After four and a half intense and wonderful years as CEO of Groupon, I've decided that I'd like to spend more time with my family. Just kidding — I was fired today. If you're wondering why... you haven't been paying attention. From controversial metrics in our S1 to our material weakness to two quarters of missing our own expectations and a stock price that's hovering around one quarter of our listing price, the events of the last year and a half speak for themselves. As CEO, I am accountable.


Mason certainly made his own decisions and he leaves Groupon a richer and more well-known man than most. He made far less money on Groupon than Lefkofsky but he certainly did well: Mason took roughly $10 million off the table during the last venture round and no doubt sold some shares after the IPO. In return, he's been labeled tech's enfant terrible and a terrible CEO. His name will forever be associated with a company that flopped on the markets, fudged its financials and generated an unsual amount of lawsuits and hatred from investors, employees, consumers, merchants and the media.

And that's too bad. Because Mason was played. He got a fraction of the benefits and the lion's share of the blame when compared with his co-founder
. As Crain's Chicago Business points out, "Mr. Mason also has control over 20 percent of Groupon's voting shares. Mr. Lefkofsky owns 20 percent of the stock but controls 28 percent of votes, thanks to a two-tiered stock structure. His longtime business partner, Brad Keywell, controls another 10 percent of the voting shares. Together, they easily trumped Mr. Mason."

Mason was an ambitious young entrepreneur who got into bed with a man who's run a very dirty game many times before. And once the rocket ship took flight, it was no doubt very difficult to get off before he was unceremoniously shown the door.

theverge.com



To: stockman_scott who wrote (235)3/6/2013 1:16:07 PM
From: Glenn Petersen1 Recommendation  Respond to of 480
 
Groupon Board Is Said to Focus CEO Search on External Candidates

By Douglas MacMillan
Bloomberg
Mar 6, 2013 10:26 AM CT

Groupon Inc. (GRPN)’s board plans to find someone from outside the company to replace Andrew Mason, who was ousted as chief executive officer of the daily deals website last week, two people with knowledge of the matter said.

Directors expect to hire an executive-recruiting firm in the next two weeks and aim to find a new CEO within three to six months, said the one of the people, who asked not to be named because the matter is private.

The new CEO will need to create a money-making business and restore credibility at the Chicago-based company, which lost$723.8 million in the past three years. Limiting the search to external candidates means Groupon is not currently considering insiders such as Chief Operating Officer Kal Raman, a veteran of Amazon.com Inc. (AMZN) and EBay Inc. (EBAY) mentioned by analysts as a top contender for the CEO job.

Eric Lefkofsky and Ted Leonsis, the board members leading the search and running the company during its transition, have been ruled out as candidates for the permanent CEO role along with other directors, said Paul Taaffe, a spokesman for Groupon. He declined to provide details on the executive search.

Groupon executives may be considered if suitable candidates cannot be found outside the company, the people said.

Raman was promoted to COO and given oversight of global sales and operations in November, after joining Groupon in April. Other Groupon managers with experience at large e-commerce companies include Chief Financial Officer Jason Child and Jeff Holden, a senior vice president of product management. Both previously worked at Seattle-based Amazon, the largest online retailer.

Challenging Search

Headhunters may struggle to find an executive willing to handle company oversight while taking orders from Lefkofsky, Groupon’s executive chairman, co-founder and largest shareholder, Adam Charlson, executive vice president of DHR International Inc., said in an interview last week.

“What CEO is going to want to take over with one of the co-founders involved in the company?” Charlson, whose firm does executive searches, said in an interview. “Anybody who takes the job is going to be looking for another job in six months.”

Groupon has no plans to change its business model after firing Mason, CFO Child said at a Deutsche Bank AG conference yesterday.

“We’ll be looking for the right long-term replacement,”Child said. “I would not expect there to be any sort of business-model changes or anything like that.”

To contact the reporter on this story: Douglas MacMillan in San Francisco at dmacmillan3@bloomberg.net

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Tom Giles at
tgiles5@bloomberg.net

bloomberg.com



To: stockman_scott who wrote (235)8/28/2013 9:58:16 AM
From: Glenn Petersen1 Recommendation

Recommended By
stockman_scott

  Respond to of 480
 
Groupon Eyes Warehouse Network For Goods

By Greg Bensinger
Aug 27, 2013

Groupon is planning a network of North American warehouses for its physical goods business, pushing the company known for coupons into more direct competition with Amazon.com AMZN +0.15%.

In an interview Tuesday, CEO Eric Lefkofsky said the Chicago company is already eyeing one space in Kentucky and is considering adding more over time.

Groupon’s “Goods” business, which sells products such as teeth-whitening pens and memory foam pillows, has been performing well in North America, nearly tripling revenue to $186 million in the most recent quarter from a year earlier.

“By bringing the shipping in house, we would improve margins,” said Lefkofsky. “It will still be a curated selection of items, we’re not going to sell everything.” He didn’t give a timeline for Groupon’s warehouse build out.

Lefkofsky said three warehouses in North America may ultimately be a sufficient number to reduce shipping times, though a spokesman later added, “We don’t have a specific number of warehouses planned or in mind.”

The move would pit Groupon against heavyweight Amazon.com and others like Overstock.com and help it satisfy customers’ desire for ever-faster delivery. Groupon has been expanding into new businesses as it seeks to rely less on its original model of emailed daily coupons for local merchants.

Unlike its competitors, Groupon offers a revolving selection of merchandise. Lefkofsky said because much of the goods are shipped through third-party companies, items can take up to seven days to arrive in some cases.

He said the Groupon model would be akin to retailer Costco Wholesale's COST -0.62% or Wal-Mart’s Sam’s Club, which offer fewer products but at cut-rate prices. “Those are examples of stores that have a limited, curated selection, but at prices customers know are lower than anywhere else,” he said.

Lefkofsky was named permanent CEO after taking the title on an interim basis after co-founder Andrew Mason was pushed out in February. The company said it had intended to conduct a search for a new CEO, but announced earlier this month it had settled upon Lefkofsky.

“What happened is, the business started performing well,” said Lefkofsky in the interview. “Starting a search would have been disruptive.”

He said he rejected the idea of hiring a search firm because it could have been distracting and “we weren’t going to do this behind closed doors.” Ultimately he agreed to run the company after he was asked by its board of directors, he said.

Lefkofsky, the single-largest Groupon stakeholder, stands to pad his stake by as much as 800,000 shares under his agreement to become CEO, which will also give him a $1 salary. “I said I really don’t want a salary,” he said. “[The board] said it’s odd if we don’t pay you at all.”

Lefkofsky seemed to suggest he and Mason, who founded the company together, are not in regular communication. “He wanted a clean break from the company,” he said. Mason, who couldn’t immediately be reached for comment, remains the fifth-largest holder of Groupon shares.

blogs.wsj.com



To: stockman_scott who wrote (235)9/19/2013 3:54:24 PM
From: Glenn Petersen1 Recommendation

Recommended By
stockman_scott

  Respond to of 480
 
Three Reasons Groupon’s Monster Rally Will Continue

By Steven Russolillo
MoneyBeat
Wall Street Journal
Sep 19, 2013

While shares of Groupon Inc. GRPN +8.74% have embarked on a massive rebound this year, one analyst predicts the rally still has plenty of room to run.

Stifel Nicolaus analyst Jordan Rohan upgraded the daily-deals provider to buy from hold and implemented a $16 price target on the stock, some 28% above Wednesday’s closing level. Accelerating growth in the U.S. and stabilization in Europe, combined with a recent trip to Groupon’s Chicago headquarters, convinced Mr. Rohan that the company is “on the right track,” he says.

“The key is the company’s focus on reducing dependence on email, focusing on mobile and app-based commerce and streamlining operations, which had been incredibly inefficient under the past CEO,” Mr. Rohan said in a note to clients, referring to former chief executive Andrew Mason. “In our view, while the company has not yet shown a big acceleration in total growth rate, the acceleration of growth is likely soon, perhaps this quarter.

“Importantly, when that accelerating growth materializes, we believe it will also come with higher margins — the necessary ingredients for multiple expansion,” Mr. Rohan says.

Shares jumped 9% to $12.59 following the upgrade. The stock price traded as low as $2.60 in November before storming back throughout much of this year.

Still, it remains well below its November 2011 initial public offering price of $20.

Mr. Rohan offers three reasons the stock should keep rallying from current levels:
  • Growth Rates: “Growth is accelerating at Groupon’s core ‘local” business in the U.S., with stability in most key European markets.”
  • Mobile: “Groupon is a leader in mobile commerce, which accounts for half of total transactions in North America today. Continued shift of usage toward app-based e-commerce should work in Groupon’s favor.”
  • Management: “The management team, led by co-founder Eric Lefkofsky, is streamlining operations and improving margins.”
Groupon has been revamping its business of emailed daily coupons into one focused on longer-term deals and closer relationships with merchants for new services such as restaurant reservations. Customers had turned away from Groupon and rival LivingSocial Inc. as discounts overwhelmed their email inboxes.

Groupon has sought to create new lines of business, such as its “Goods” unit, which sells discounted merchandise. The company is also relying more heavily on discounts purchased from customers’ smartphones and tablets, which can be personalized and location-specific.

Even amid the upgrade, Mr. Rohan says one concern surrounding the company is “the timing and extent of profitability of Groupon Goods,” which account for 31% of the company’s so-called billings (the amount the company receives from deal and product purchases before it pays a cut to merchants).

“The margin/growth trajectory of Groupon Goods is unclear, as the company must undertake infrastructure and G&A investment to shift to first party and grow meaningfully outside the U.S.,” Mr. Rohan says.

But overall, Mr. Rohan is confident the stock price still has upside from current levels.

“The stock call today has to do with a broader view of the direction of digital media stocks, particularly those with potential upside from increased usage on mobile apps,” he says. “We believe the fundamental improvements at Groupon will continue through 2014 and beyond.”

blogs.wsj.com