Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: koan who wrote (87508)	4/22/2012 1:37:55 PM
From: longnshort	1 Recommendation Respond to of 89467

"But scientists can prove AGW which is why 99% believe in it." no they can't science lied, hide the decline

To: koan who wrote (87508)	4/22/2012 3:48:58 PM
From: Hawkmoon	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 89467

But scientists can prove AGW which is why 99% believe in it. They can? Guess there's no more reason to fund their research then, right? I, and others far more qualified than myself, remain less convinced that GW is ENTIRELY DUE to Anthropogenic sources. Btw, a large percentage of atmospheric scientists once believed we were on the verge of a major ice age.. I think that was just about 40 years ago.. Hmmm.... Hawk

To: koan who wrote (87508)	4/22/2012 3:54:26 PM
From: Hawkmoon	Respond to of 89467

But scientists can prove AGW which is why 99% believe in it. They can? Guess there's no more reason to fund their research then, right? I, and others far more qualified than myself, remain less convinced that GW is ENTIRELY DUE to Anthropogenic sources. Btw, a large percentage of atmospheric scientists once believed we were on the verge of a major ice age.. I think that was just about 40 years ago.. Hmmm.... If the church had not threatened the scientists people would nto have beleived such nonsesne the church said was real! The "church" of Global Warming is directed by those who seek to use unsubstantiated fear-mongering to control people politically and economically. That's where "Carbon Trading" and Carbon Taxes come from, which both Wall St traders, and Gov't revenue collectors are both chomping at the bit to see passed. Look at all the money people like Al Gore (living in their huge mansions and jetting all around) make touting gov't subsidies for alternative energy technologies that cannot compete, both in reliability/availability or financially, to current energy sources. People like you overlook the huge financial and governmental aspects surrounding the advocation of AGW. And once gov't has that control, they will be loath to give it up. You do not know that, or as mentioned, what they know or do not now. Neither do you.. your AGW scientists skew and manipulate the data, or just make it up altogether (eg: Michael Mann and CRU). Hawk