Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Ask Mohan about the Market -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Zeev Hed who wrote (9307)	11/24/1997 9:02:00 PM
From: Haim R. Branisteanu	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 18056

VLSI and CA - each company management was/is issuing misleading statements for a while by now, in an effort to manipulate the respective stock price higher. Yesterday I posted that VLSI, selfpromoting stock by company manegement, crashed today from $30 to $22 3/4 and from $32 only two days ago - reason Oh well soem cultural things in accounting and revenue projections. Let's see from 32 to 22 3/4 is about 29% does it qualify for a crash?? Yesterday I posted on this tread that the two stock I anticipate to crash as a result of misleading company statements are VLSI and CA. So VLSI followed my assumptions next CA. exchange2000.com Haim

To: Zeev Hed who wrote (9307)	11/24/1997 9:33:00 PM
From: Bilow	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 18056

Those cash flows are for all US companies, in total, private and public. The numbers are not directly comparable to stock market indices because the stock market indices are designed to show what the result of investing in the stock market would be, rather than what the total value of the stock market is. (In other words, the issuance of new stock immediately increases the total stock market capitalization, but doesn't immediately change the stock market indices.) I don't have a good feel for what the long-term differences between the indexes and the total market caps should be. New stock issuance should inflate the market cap numbers, while stock buybacks should do the reverse. You can see why I want the market cap numbers, rather than just the capital gains returns. I've not been able to find total market cap data, though I've been looking for at least an hour. Anybody have data? -- Carl