To: Road Walker who wrote (132515 ) 4/30/2012 4:13:31 PM From: Zen Dollar Round Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 213172 Does the Dow Jones Industrial Average Need a Makeover or a Grave? I vote for the grave. ----- If the Dow Jones Industrial Average ( ^DJI ) were the subject of a roast, and I was emcee, how could I not start by poking fun at its parentage? I mean, this fabled 110-year-old index was so loved and admired by investors the world over that its founders saw the need to sell it to the Chicago Mercantile Exchange ( CME ) two years ago. But seriously folks, IBM ( IBM ) alone is to the Dow what Apple ( AAPL ), Exxon ( XOM ), Microsoft ( MSFT ), and Chevron ( CVX ) are to the S&P 500 (i.e. about 12% of the index). Talk about a weight problem. Of course Alcoa ( AA ) stands out on the other end of the spectrum of Dow's arbitrary collection of 30 stocks. Its mere inclusion implies mounds of praise upon a small and shrinking business that is all but buried in the S&P 500 at number 290. "Every professional investor that I know looks at the S&P and not the Dow," says Stephen Weiss, author of The Big Win , in the attached video. "It's 30-minus stocks; it's hard to argue for the relevance." But that is exactly what Barron's is doing. Their weekend story, " Shake Up the Dow! " lays out what many investors have privately been thinking for years. They even go as far as to name names, correctly suggesting that more modern bellwethers like Apple and Google ( GOOG ) are far more influential and should be considered in place of smaller names like Alcoa or Hewlett-Packard ( HPQ ). There are other flaws with the Dow Industrials, as we know it, including the fact that it is tabulated on a share price basis (the higher the stock price, the higher the weighting) instead of the more democratically derived market cap methodology. "You do need a measurement to see how the market did," Weiss says, adding that investors should "take it for what it is, purely on face value—nothing deeper."