Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Wayners who wrote (654975)	5/15/2012 5:50:55 PM
From: FJB	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1583504

CHRIS MATTHEWS TO BLACK BISHOP: 'I HOPE YOU EVOLVE' by DANA LOESCH 21 hours ago breitbart.com Newsbusters caught Chris Matthews telling Bishop Harry Jackson "I hope you evolve" while talking gay marriage. He then giggled and said disingenuously, "I'm just teasing." I asked earlier when the left was going to turn on the black community for questioning the President's gay marriage remarks. They're reserving their anger not for the President who refused to make gay marriage part of the DNC platform (and whose words are meaningless lip service to avoid further lefty criticism), but for the black Christians who are trying to live their lives according to faith. It wouldn't be the first time black churches faced bully tactics: back in the 50s they faced much worse for not toeing the Democrat party line. I'm sure will see a column from Joan Walsh decrying the racist overtones of Matthews's remark, considering she thinks "food stamps" is a slur. I'm sure we'll see a boycott campaign organized by the Soros-funded Media Matters. Don't you think. /Rhetorical.

To: Wayners who wrote (654975)	5/15/2012 7:13:42 PM
From: joseffy	2 Recommendations Respond to of 1583504

Hatch calls for investigation into Obama’s Labor Dept ‘propaganda’ posters featuring Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson 05/15/2012 By Matthew Boyle - The Daily Caller dailycaller.com Utah Republican Sen. Orrin Hatch has called for an investigation to determine if President Barack Obama’s Secretary of Labor, Hilda Solis, broke the law with posters she’s placed around the Labor Department headquarters. A few weeks ago, The Daily Caller first reported that Solis had placed posters in elevators throughout the Washington, D.C., Labor Department headquarters. Those posters featured a photo of Solis marching in protest alongside the Rev. Jesse Jackson and MSNBC television host Rev. Al Sharpton, among others. She was acting as an emissary of the Obama administration protesting against Alabama’s strict new law combating illegal immigration. Solis had her arms locked with Sharpton, and Jackson is a few feet away. The poster also carried a message for federal government employees — who are traditionally expected to be apolitical in the performance of their duties. “Whether we take to the streets or simply do our work with integrity and commitment here at the U.S. Department of Labor,” the poster read, above Solis’ signature, “We are all marching toward the same goals: safer workplaces, fair pay, dignity on the job, secure retirement and opportunities to make a better life. I believe in the power of collective action.” On Tuesday, Hatch wrote to the Labor Department’s Deputy Inspector General Daniel Petrole asking him to “investigate this matter thoroughly to determine whether the insertion of these posters violates any federal laws, including the Hatch Act, and whether the Secretary’s message has created a hostile work environment for any federal employees who might have differing political views.” Hatch said Solis’ “poster campaign” conveys an “overtly political message.” Hatch said he thinks it’s “vital” to make sure “American taxpayers are not subsidizing partisan political messages, particularly during this contentious election season.” He said it’s also important to “ensure that federal government employees are not subjected [to] political propaganda in the workplace.” Rick Manning, a spokesman for Americans for Limited Government believes Hatch’s concern deserves President Obama’s attention. “When someone with the integrity and power of Orrin Hatch starts demanding answers about the obvious attempt to politicize and indoctrinate the civil service ranks,” said Manning, “it becomes a serious problem for the Administration.” Read more: dailycaller.com

To: Wayners who wrote (654975)	5/15/2012 10:13:29 PM
From: puborectalis	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1583504

The problem with this assertion is that there is little indication either in American history or in the current polls that the American people do, indeed, want a businessman in the White House. In fact, every time one has presented himself, the voters have turned their backs—often just months after the public seemed to be calling for the very candidacy they now were rejecting. One businessman who resisted the temptation was Chrysler boss Iacocca in 1988. When people were giving him money and demanding that he run for president, Iacocca sought advice from then-House Speaker Tip O’Neill. As Iacocca recounted in his book, O’Neill told him, “You’re used to running a big corporation. When you make a decision in the morning, you either earn a profit that day or you don’t. You can’t run a government that way. It would drive you crazy. You wouldn’t last a year. You’d have a heart attack because of the frustration.” Iacocca wrote that he concluded “that to run for president you’ve got to be over-ambitious or just plain crazy.” And the lesson he took was that “you can be a success in business and not have the temperament to be president.” But others atop the business world either could not resist the blandishments or could not believe that they couldn’t run the nation’s affairs better than any politician could. Henry Ford ran for the Senate in Michigan in 1918 as a Democrat and wanted to run against Calvin Coolidge for the Republican presidential nomination in 1924. But, dogged by allegations of anti-Semitism, he concluded he could not get enough support from GOP kingmakers. Five decades later, Ross Perot believed he was the only leader capable of dealing with the nation’s deficits and self-financed independent presidential runs in both 1992 and 1996. But only once in the nation’s history has a businessman who never held any public elected or appointed office managed to get a major party nomination for president. That was in 1940, when Indiana utility executive and lawyer Wendell Willkie won the Republican nomination to go against President Franklin D. Roosevelt. He lost in a landslide. The record since has shown a few victories in state or municipal races for political newbies in their first political offices—billionaire Michael Bloomberg as mayor of New York City, plastics executive Ron Johnson as senator from Wisconsin, and health care entrepreneur Rick Scott as governor of Florida. But most of the candidates who touted their business expertise have lost even at the state level. That was true even last year, despite an incredibly friendly atmosphere for Republicans. To see why business candidates often stumble when they enter politics, look no further than California in 2010. Republicans nominated two businesswomen—eBay executive Meg Whitman for governor against Democrat Jerry Brown and former Hewlett-Packard boss Carly Fiorina for the U.S. Senate against incumbent Democrat Barbara Boxer. “Both had lots of things about them that were attractive,” said veteran California Democratic strategist Bill Carrick. “But at the end of the day, they came up short, running against two accomplished political veterans.” He said that was particularly true in the governor’s race because of Brown’s “grasp of the issues and knowledge and understanding of the substance and how to talk about the problems confronting the state. That turned out to be a huge advantage.” Both Whitman and Fiorina “talked about things in the same top-sider, business perspective. And I don’t think anyone responded to that particular message,” he said. Politicians understand they will get media scrutiny. They understand their lives will be examined. And they understand how to respond when allegations surface of the type confronting Cain. Carrick said that most candidates “would instantly recognize that the way to handle this is to get every bit of information at your disposal out there and deal with it right away and get it over with.” In contrast, Cain did just about everything wrong in response. Most laughable to Carrick was when Cain refused to answer questions over the weekend. When a reporter politely persisted, Cain turned to an aide and said, “Please send him the journalistic code of ethics.” “Can you imagine you get pulled over by a cop for speeding and you hand him the city code of ethics?” asked an incredulous Carrick. “When you are doing that, you have already lost the battle.” Presidential historian George C. Edwards of Texas A&M University said most business candidates have failed throughout history because the worlds of business and politics are so dramatically different. “They have a mind-set and it’s difficult to adjust that mind-set to a different world, and politics is very much a different world than business,” he said. In the business world, executives usually get their way with compliant boards and deputies they appointed. In government, there is a Congress, there are courts, and there are other world leaders with their own views. “The ability to compromise, the ability to negotiate with people who also have power as opposed to ordering them what to do. These are needed skills,” said Edwards. “It’s why, on average, businessmen who have been cabinet secretaries also have not been particularly successful.” In 2012, there is also the reality that many voters blame boardroom excess and corporate greed for plunging the nation into a deep recession that started in 2008. “There is the image problem of someone from the corporate world,” said Carrick. “And then there is also the fact that if you spend your life in politics, you just know how to behave in a campaign in ways that are much stronger than if you are somebody who has been in the private sector and has never been in politics.” He said the problem for a candidate like Cain “is compounded by the fact that we have constant media coverage and scores of best-selling books all highly critical of business and corporate behavior in America.” And because business candidates don’t have voting records and public records to scrutinize, their business resumes are closely examined. “It never seems,” said Carrick, “that anybody from the business community is quite prepared to deal with that.” Certainly, Cain was not.