SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Big Black Swan who wrote (489028)5/29/2012 6:34:59 PM
From: Jorj X Mckie1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793972
 
Bush #2 and Clinton did drugs, but they were both dishonest and evasive in their reporting of it. They thus set even worse role-models IMO.

I do wish they had answered the question with "yes I did, I'm not proud of it and if I had to do it over again, I wouldn't. Everyone knows that Clinton inhaled...probably more than once.

My problem isn't that Obama smoked pot. It's that it was part of his identity. It was a lifestyle choice. It would be the same with alcohol or gambling or any other vice. If a presidential candidate got drunk a couple of times and even made a fool of himself....so what? But if being drunk was a way of life....Gambling..same thing. Played some poker, craps...blackjack....no big thang. But if he took out a second mortgage on the home to fund the gambling habit. Probably not the right guy to run the country.



To: Big Black Swan who wrote (489028)5/29/2012 7:44:18 PM
From: Farmboy3 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793972
 
Bush #2 and Clinton did drugs, but they were both dishonest and evasive in their reporting of it.

I was unaware there had been any proof of these acts brought to light. Could you refer me please, to the source you used prior to making such a definitive statement? Thanks.