Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (489066)	5/30/2012 2:50:33 AM
From: LindyBill	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 794372

Anything but Assad? That is the question, IMO. If that is what the admin thinks, but are avoiding it for election reasons, that's awful. But in their case, understandable.

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (489066)	5/30/2012 10:04:43 AM
From: John Carragher	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 794372

are we going to end up with an expanded Iran nation. iraq, syria, egypt etc. Iran along with russia are in syria to support the Assad. Russia could care less who runs the nation as long as they can play spoiler and sell arms to them. What can the united states do other than work with the other arab nations and eu. Putin loves to flex his muscles and i assume is loving every bit of this action. i doubt obama is ready or willing to entertain military action.