Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: knight who wrote (28426)	11/26/1997 8:17:00 AM
From: go4it	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 35569

knight, <<Chuck, with all due respect, I think you should take off those rose colored glasses and take a second look.>> My glasses aren't even photo-greys. You are absolutely correct in stating the problems that IPM faces but to use your scenario one would have to assume that every single jr in the mining sector is about to go down because the majority of them are priced way below what IPM is and they need the financing the same exact way that IPM does. They don't have the institutional backing that IPM does and they don't have mineralization that IPM does. These mining companies are not valued for their mineralizations after the feasibility studues are in hand they are valued for the mineralization prior to the feasibility studies and then even more after the feasibility studies are completed positive and these are facts. Please explain where my glasses are rose colored. Chuck