Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: go4it who wrote (28474)	11/26/1997 8:01:00 PM
From: knight	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 35569

Chuck, << These mining companies are not valued for their mineralizations after the feasibility studues are in hand they are valued for the mineralization prior to the feasibility studies and then even more after the feasibility studies are completed positive and these are facts. Please explain where my glasses are rose colored. >> One cannot keep making comparisons between the IPM deposit ( I use that term loosely ) and deposits being developed by other jr miners. There are too many unkowns here. If IPM had a viable extraction process both physicaly and economicaly, then you you could crunch a few numbers and come up with some evaluations dollar-wise. Why invest in a company that's packing a lot of excess baggage when you have your choice of some high potential under-valued jr's that can actually mine their deposit? Mind you, I'm far from being a rocket scientist, so I maybe missing something here. knight