SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : President Barack Obama -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: manalagi who wrote (114526)6/1/2012 12:57:03 PM
From: RetiredNow  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 149317
 
manalagi,
that's a bit of a strawman. No one expects the economy to have been fixed in Obama's first term. What reasonable people like me expect is that we should have been put on a path to recovery and a path to fiscal stability and economic growth. There has been no real recovery. Fiscal and economic volatility has increased, so stability is a joke. And sustainable economic growth is nowhere in sight.

I don't blame Obama entirely. There are just so many problem in place that it would take a miracle worker. I'm not ready to vote for Romney either. The more this race moves forward, the less enthused by him that I become, in part thanks to alot of the insightful posts I read here. It gives me good perspective and additional angles to explore.

I don't know what the answers are, although I have opinions. Mostly, I know that what we have right now is not working. Things are getting worse, not better. I want a President that understands that Keynesianism is not the answer and I want a President that takes his duty to defend the Constitution seriously and I want a President that vigorously prosecutes criminals who break the law. Right now, I'm getting none of those things from Obama. I don't think Romney would be any better. Ron Paul would, but he's not in the running anymore. So I'm not sure who to vote for.



To: manalagi who wrote (114526)6/1/2012 1:11:04 PM
From: bentway  Respond to of 149317
 
" Don't think that GWB 2 wars, gave money to the rich and let the middle class struggle have any effect on European problems? Think again. "

It was the Bush Global Economic Collapse that got these marginal European countries in such trouble. Their banks were loaning money to anyone with a pulse, trying to keep up with OUR banks, and it led to the same end.

The difference is we bailed out our banks and industries, while the Euros took the austerity route - the same path the Republicans would have us take today.



To: manalagi who wrote (114526)6/1/2012 1:11:26 PM
From: ChinuSFO  Respond to of 149317
 
I am thinking of pulling all my funds from TD Ameritrade. I have a broker here who keeps calling me. I don't use him since I mange my portfolio. But lately, I told to go tell his management how upset I am and that I may pull out and move to ETrade.

Yes indeed, kit is far far easier to break things than to fix it. Obama has not been good at campaigning with people. I realized that during the summer when we had te debate on Obamacare. He remained in DC during that time whereas he should have been on the road. H failed to recognize that he would kettle votes in DC if he convinced the people in general. Instead he only focused on getting the votes in DC. I think he is on a similar path for his re election. I was surprised to see Boehner out there today wheN he should be one hiding since the economy turned south and became tepid after his party came to power in the House. Wonder why tTeam O is not bringing those out to the people and instead letting Romney define Obama. I hope O is not late for the party.



To: manalagi who wrote (114526)6/1/2012 1:12:15 PM
From: RetiredNow  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 149317
 
Still, Obama refuses to prosecute the big fish among JPM, BoA, GS, and the other TBTFs. Yet, he'll go after the small fish. Why? Because the big fish like Corzine of MF Global are allowed to engage in blatant criminality, simply because they were big Obama donors and Obama is afraid to offend the deep pockets of Wall Street. I'm sickened. And no, Romney would be no better than Obama at this. Rather, Romney would likely line the Wall Street pockets even further.

----------------

Oh Look, Handcuffs!

I saw these!



Abacus Federal Savings Bank, a small bank with a major presence in New York City’s Chinese community, and 19 of its former employees have been charged with inflating the qualifications of mortgage applicants to meet federal loan standards, a scheme that prosecutors say brought the bank tens of millions of dollars in ill-gotten fees and sent hundreds of millions of dollars in risky mortgages to the investment market. The indictment against the bank and its employees describes the sort of scheme that led to the financial crisis of 2008, when the risk of mortgages to borrowers was disguised and passed on to investors. As those mortgages went bad, banks considered too big to fail were brought to their knees and bailed out by taxpayers.
Where have I heard that before? Oh yeah, it was here, under oath....

These mortgages were sold to Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and other investors. Although we did not underwrite these mortgages, Citi did rep and warrant to the investors that the mortgages were underwritten to Citi credit guidelines.In mid-2006 I discovered that over 60% of these mortgages purchased and sold were defective. Because Citi had given reps and warrants to the investors that the mortgages were not defective, the investors could force Citi to repurchase many billions of dollars of these defective assets. This situation represented a large potential risk to the shareholders of Citigroup.Testimony of Richard M. Bowen, III page 2I started issuing warnings in June of 2006 and attempted to get management to address these critical risk issues. These warnings continued through 2007 and went to all levels of the Consumer Lending Group.We continued to purchase and sell to investors even larger volumes of mortgages through 2007. And defective mortgages increased during 2007 to over 80% of production.
So once again, why are we seeing the small fish who put up a few bad mortgages arrested while those big fish who admitted to stuffing the channel with 80% of their production with knowingly-defective product have not seen the same thing happen to them?

Remember folks, nobody committed any crimes.