Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : President Barack Obama -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (115830)	6/25/2012 7:55:25 PM
From: koan	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 149317

I didn't mean to play a game tejek. It was a serious question. Here is why. I don't think there is a viable conservative philosophy, nor was there ever one in the last 100 years. Here is part of where I am coming from. IMO, liberals are right about most of the major issues. Liberals don't have 50% of the answers and conservatives the other 50%. I think it is more 90/10 left , right. Why, one would ask? Take the 50 top issues. We liberals go over and over these issees looking for the logic. We learn from many sources. In my circle of liberal friends we are always discussing the issues. When I am with my conservative friends and they are half of my friends, we never discuss issues. We discuss life, but not ideas. E.g. So when we realize gayness is genetic and people are born like that, then gay marriage clearly is a civil rights issue and should be legal. Liberals can all see that. Consrvatives seem blind to the logic. Look at all the time you spent on those right wing threads. All they ever wanted to do was fight with you, or me, or anyone. They were not interested in a constructive discussion of ideas. And as often as not the rocks they hurled were obtain from FOX news. Oxymoron. Then take a thread like this where we generally try to build on each others ideas. How often have you ever seen roadwalker and I fight, or bentway. Never. We disagree on things at times, but we talk them over. Big difference. So I maintain there is no viable right wing philosophy, and saying so is a case of false equivalency.