Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Mainstream Politics and Economics -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LLCF who wrote (18707)	6/26/2012 3:14:28 PM
From: Wharf Rat	Read Replies (5) \| Respond to of 85487

EPA scores major court victory By Steve Benen - Tue Jun 26, 2012 2:43 PM EDT This probably won't generate as much attention as it deserves, but a unanimous ruling from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit seems like a pretty big deal. A federal appeals court on Tuesday upheld the Environmental Protection Agency's regulations to reduce greenhouse gases that contribute to climate change, throwing out legal challenges by states and industry groups that argued the EPA had exceeded its authority under the Clean Air Act by declaring that carbon emissions endanger public health. The decision is a huge victory for the administration's efforts to address climate change in the face of congressional gridlock on the issue and increasing skepticism among Republicans that climate change is a problem the country needs to address. As court victories go, this decision doesn't just deal with a critically important issue, it was also a one-sided win for the EPA. State GOP officials and a group of polluters went after every aspect of the EPA's climate policy, and they lost badly. Fairly early on in the Obama presidency, the administration concluded that carbon emissions endanger public health and welfare -- the "endangerment finding" -- which is a key part of regulating emissions through the Clean Air Act. The plaintiffs said Obama's EPA couldn't do this, and the appeals court disagreed. And remember the dreaded " tailoring rule"? Republicans and polluters said the EPA couldn't possibly have this kind of authority, but the appeals court rejected this, too. Philip Bump went through today's decision in some detail, highlighting the key takeaways: "1. The Court determined that the EPA absolutely has authority to regulate greenhouse gases as a pollutant.... 2. Even if there were uncertainty about climate science -- the argument advanced by the petitioners -- the entire point of the EPA regulations is to be proactive in addressing problems.... 3. Anyway, the EPA's science on impact is well-reasoned and thorough." The issue is very likely headed to the Supreme Court, but in the meantime, today hands the Obama administration and those concerned with the climate crisis a big win. maddowblog.msnbc.msn.com