Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sr K who wrote (493562)	6/30/2012 6:34:08 AM
From: Nadine Carroll	9 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793964

It doesn't start until 2014. Plenty of time to change it no matter who wins in November. The delay tells you all you need to know about the lies that were told concerning both its costs and its benefits. If the law had really 'given people healthcare' the obvious thing to do was to implement as fast as humanly possible, so the recipients of the benefits could vote to keep it. I was against it, and I'm still against it. It's the law, but it can be changed. No, it can't be changed. It's too horrendous for that. It must be repealed.

To: Sr K who wrote (493562)	6/30/2012 3:10:39 PM
From: KLP	1 Recommendation Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 793964

Give it a rest, "Special" K......IF you get cancer, or any number of other things, your neighbors won't want to pay for that either. WHAT do you think the word "insurance" means.....it means some coverage IF you get anything that Mother Nature decides to throw at you.... For me, the pre-existing conditions arguments are false. I don't want smokers or people who are overweight to get a free ride at my expense. I want personal responsibility. Rewards and penalties.