SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Apple Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Cogito who wrote (137010)7/3/2012 3:23:22 PM
From: Dan Fleuris  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 213183
 
Maybe, but due diligence should mean more than, "They told me it was so."
Dan



To: Cogito who wrote (137010)7/3/2012 3:42:37 PM
From: Win-Lose-Draw  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 213183
 
I think that what happened is that the Taiwan Proview company misrepresented their ownership of the trademark.

I think, maybe, that theory depends on more...."predictability"...than the Chinese legal system has.



To: Cogito who wrote (137010)7/3/2012 7:49:03 PM
From: manalagi  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 213183
 
I think that what happened is that the Taiwan Proview company misrepresented their ownership of the trademark
Apple operates internationally and it has legal consultants all over the world. They should have done a DD to find out where its trademark is valid. PR of China is a huge country, and that must be the first place to check if the trademark sold to Apple included that part of the world.

Ignorance of the law is no excuse.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News