SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: SilentZ who wrote (663118)7/20/2012 3:40:09 PM
From: joseffy1 Recommendation  Respond to of 1576880
 
Valerie Jarrett has no connection to Michelle Obama?



To: SilentZ who wrote (663118)7/20/2012 3:45:00 PM
From: longnshort1 Recommendation  Respond to of 1576880
 
fact check is run by bill ayers they have no credibility



To: SilentZ who wrote (663118)7/20/2012 3:47:47 PM
From: joseffy  Respond to of 1576880
 
Bill Ayers will tell us what to think.

LOL



To: SilentZ who wrote (663118)7/20/2012 4:14:10 PM
From: Brumar891 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1576880
 
She went from earning $121,910 in 2004 as an executive director at the hospital to making $316,962 in 2005 as a vice president, according to tax returns filed by the Obamas for those years.
.....
It’s true that after her departure, the hospital did not fill the position of vice president for community and external affairs. But the column doesn’t mention that she had reduced her work schedule to part time well before she left and wasn’t making that much money when she officially resigned.

factcheck.org

Obama was sworn in as a senator on January 3, 2005.


Factcheck strives to quibble about whether she worked full time, whether her income included compensation other than salary, etc ... but the basic facts they're trying to obsfuscate are that her salary skyrocketed after her husband was elected US Senator! And her job was eliminated when she left to move to Washington.



To: SilentZ who wrote (663118)7/21/2012 5:22:52 PM
From: steve harris  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1576880
 
Try again Z, your talking about something else.

Look at the Obama's tax returns, you'll see her new wages being reported on their 2005 tax return.

It is true, and her job was sooo important, it wasn't filled after she left for the WhiteHouse.

Edit:
I see Brumar already presented you with why your rebuttal doesn't fly.

Message 28281236