SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : President Barack Obama -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: roto who wrote (117357)7/22/2012 11:31:49 PM
From: koan  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 149317
 
Oh, I don't mean to rag on him. It is just what I see straight up. Maybe I am full of shit.

I compare Brooks to Paul Krugman, Chris hays, and Noam Chomsky.

I am more interested in the lack of a coherent philosophy on the right. The MSM keeps giving us that false equivalency bit. I try hard not to be a cheerleader for the left, but for 30/40 years the left has been vilified by the right and gotten away with it.

It has been very seldom the left's philosophy gets put forth in its full context, until recently by MSNBC staff, like Ezra Klein, Chris Hays, Alex Wagner and Rachel Maddow who are starting to break ground for the liberal philosophy.

A hard review of history over the last century shows the liberals have the ideas and virtually always lead the way into the future, from giving the women the right to vote and equal rights act, to the New Deal, to ending segregation and today gay marriage and defending against the right wings war on women and denial of AGW.

The conservative ideas are put forth as the foundation to reacted to , or at least seen as valid, like tax cuts, but are mostly nuts, or self serving to the rich and right wing.

So one has to ask what exactly is Brooks, or Buckly for that matter, talking about?