Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Evolution -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brumar89 who wrote (28981)	7/28/2012 9:31:57 PM
From: Solon	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 69300

Initial estimates predicted abundant life in the universe, but revised estimates now predict that life is almost certainly unique in the galaxy, and probably unique in the universe. FALSE Even though there are lots of stars in the universe, the odds are against any of them supporting complex life. FALSE It is true that life requires many conditions. That is why millions and millions of life forms are EXTINCT! Their "design" is insufficient! Evolution and reality created dinosaurs. Evolution and reality destroyed them. "you are overwhelmingly likely NOT to get a royal flush. In our case, a royal flush is a life-permitting universe)." But they (royal flushes) occur continuously wherever cards are dealt! Ho Hum! So this blogger has admitted that life-permitting universes are inevitable. And the building blocks of life exist throughout the universe. So it would appear a no-brainer that life has self-organized in myriad planets similar to planet earth and circling similar suns...as well (possibly) in completely different and diverse solar systems. While the conditions necessary to support human life are specific and defined by ranges, nevertheless, life in general is so diverse that some form of life can exist in the most extreme conditions known. So that even if the earth was completely inhospitable to humans (as it was), it still could and did support other forms of life. One suspects on the basis of probability, therefore, that life is extremely common...since the conditions to support life are so extremely common throughout the universe! Facts are facts!!

To: Brumar89 who wrote (28981)	7/28/2012 10:32:21 PM
From: J_F_Shepard	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 69300

Creation Scientists To Search for Talking Snake Bones in AfricaAt what point in history did snakes lose their vocal cords and legs? Creation Scientists turn to the Bible and the continent of Africa for an answer. Freehold, Iowa - Most True Christians™ acknowledge that the key to solving the greatest mystery of Creation Science may lay buried deep within the heart of African jungle. Creation Scientists agree that snakes lost their vocal cords along with their legs between 8,000 and 7,800 BC. Today, modern Christians, like those at the newly founded, Creation Studies Institute, are spending almost a million dollars, and investing countless hours to gather the evidence needed to prove, without a doubt, to the secular scientific community, that the planet Earth was once populated with walking, talking snakes. "Christians have The Talking Snake Theory, and Atheists have Evolution," says Creation Scientist, Dr. Jonathan Edwards. "Only one can be correct. Sadly, until us Creation Scientists can prove that snakes once had vocal cords, I expect that them silly old hell-bound evil-lutionists won't take us seriously." landoverbaptist.org