Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: MulhollandDrive who wrote (499497)	7/31/2012 5:41:12 PM
From: Bob	10 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 794309

What's next? I don't know. But bi-racial and divorcees are "stretching" it in my opinion..........I would argue against the cake shop in those instances. What's next on the definition of marriage? Where does the left take this next? Marry your dog or cat or bird? Why not? Marry your sister or brother? Why not? Marry your son or daughter? Why not. You don't think any one of those are possible? They are trivializing the Sacrament. Marriage to probably a great percentage of our population is a "sacred" act. It is a sacrament in the Christian faith, very, very important to us. If gays want a "civil" union, go at it, government can give that their approval all they want, and provide any and all benefits to those in that civil union. Government has no business in what is basically a "religious" ceremony.