SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Mainstream Politics and Economics -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: koan who wrote (21546)8/1/2012 10:34:26 AM
From: Sdgla1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 85487
 
There is your requested example of your mind being closed.

consider both strange guys e.g. I not only disagree with the neo cons, I think they have done great damage to this country and pure laissez faire as nothing more than simplistic mythology.
A fair minded thinker would post examples and explain his pov.. as opposed to your close minded response above.

For example.. here is a snippet from T Sowell... please tell me where you disagree with him :

During a recent Fox News Channel debate about the Obama administration's tax policies, Democrat Bob Beckel raised the issue of "fairness."

He pointed out that a child born to a poor woman in the Bronx enters the world with far worse prospects than a child born to an affluent couple in Connecticut.

No one can deny that. The relevant question, however, is: How does allowing politicians to take more money in taxes from successful people, to squander in ways that will improve their own reelection prospects, make anything more "fair" for others?

Even if additional tax revenue all went to poor single mothers — which it will not — the multiple problems of children raised by poor single mothers would not be cured by throwing money at them. Indeed, the skyrocketing of unwed motherhood began when government welfare programs began throwing money at teenage girls who got pregnant.

Children born and raised without fathers are a major problem to society and to themselves. There is nothing "fair" about increasing the number of such children.

A more fundamental problem with the "fairness" issue raised by Beckel and many others is the slippery vagueness of the word "fair."



WRT to fairness... another example.

I posted to you how M Romney gave his inheritance away to his charity of choice. Your reply... it wasnt a real charity.

I posted to you how M Romney takes care of not only all of his family but shut down his entire business in order to help locate a missing daughter of one of his co workers... contrasted with Obama ignoring his brother who is living as a homeless person in Kenya.

Your reply covers both the charity and fairness points wrt liberals.

I could go on with more examples if you are interested.