Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Paul Smith who wrote (499971)	8/2/2012 8:20:56 PM
From: MulhollandDrive	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793549

sounds like a lot of hot air to me :)

To: Paul Smith who wrote (499971)	8/2/2012 8:29:41 PM
From: MrLucky	8 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793549

<Why Pawlenty would be the best pick for Veep> Very bad choice. He did not hold up against other GOP candidates in the runoff. A nice guy? Yes. Capable of bringing Minnesota? Doubtful. A safe choice? Yes. Now if Romney wants to play it the safe way like our so-called GOP experts tell us each day (Dewhurst etc.), then the former Minnesota Governor should be chosen. Those who would suggest that Pawlenty as a good choice must believe that GOP caution is essential since Obama is such a strong candidate. I am of the opinion that Obama will lose by at the least the same margin as McCain. I say, pick a strong VP candidate who is viewed as having high potential as a VP and as a solid Romney replacement. And that is not Pawlenty.