Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Mainstream Politics and Economics -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Steve Lokness who wrote (22573)	8/7/2012 2:17:05 PM
From: longnshort	1 Recommendation Respond to of 85487

didn't romney run for President against McCain in the primary ? "the single year after Romney decided to run for President" this has been pointed out to you time after time but you stick to the same bullshit talking point. Like you did with chick fil a and 100 other topic. I know you have me on ignore but I'll point this out to the luckers

To: Steve Lokness who wrote (22573)	8/7/2012 2:25:28 PM
From: work4ever	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 85487

After calling me boy in your last post, you now warn me not to have a hissy fit. Nice. I don't believe i have yet expressed an opinion on whether Romney should release more tax returns. I was drawn into this discussion because you and other leftists continue to repeat the lie that the Romneys took a huge horsey deduction on their 2010 tax returns. Got it? Their 2010 returns. That's what the articles you have been posting have claimed. Their 2010 returns. Not some previous returns. Is it clear yet? They've been lying about the return that is openly available. The 2010 return. You know, the one for tax year 2010. The left has been lying about it. Now would it be a good idea for Romney to release more returns? i'll have to think about that. After all, what could possibly go wrong? Things have gone so well with the 2010 return. Do I care if Ann Romney took a medical deduction for the horse in a prior year? Well, I'd say the odds of that are about one in a bazillion. But, no! I don't care! If the IRS is OK with it, I'm OK with it.