Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Naxos Resources (NAXOF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: GlobalMarine who wrote (5952)	11/28/1997 12:23:00 PM
From: mark silvers	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 20681

Rand I think he outlined most of them in his last missive. He doesn't think current mgmt is capable.He also holds it against Naxos that L. Steffy wrote negative pieces against IPM(it appears rightly so)and pro-Naxos. His comments stressing the favoribility of IPM mgmt over that of Naxos is laughable in light of all the information that has surfaced in recent days. Any comments made by Jay at this point have to be taken purely as spin control. His recommendation is , to put it technically, "sucking wind". Mark

To: GlobalMarine who wrote (5952)	11/28/1997 12:52:00 PM
From: RRG	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 20681

miningstocks.com (Jay Taylor) Jay Taylor's Nov 22nd letter still recommends that his readers sell Naxos and buy IPM. Further, he states he will explain this in his December letter. Could it be that he is expecting an adverse assay report on Naxos which, of course, would certainly take the stock price into a major downard direction---thus giving him genius status. Of course, he could be wrong---and most (including myself) think he will be VERY wrong. If so, he no doubt will come up with some marvelous cop-out. Should be interesting! Henry V---thanks for your abbreviation explanations. I have another suggested abbreviation that might be applicable to people like J. Taylor------KMA. Do you need a translation?