SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Wayners who wrote (140746)8/12/2012 8:19:48 PM
From: tonto6 Recommendations  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 224750
 
Excellent post Wayners. Many lies will be proven to be false. Their campaign of deceit will fall apart...once independents hear repeatedly how they have been lied to by Obama and his administration and the harm caused by their poor decisions...

In this 1960 Supreme Court decision Nestor's denial of benefits was upheld even though he had contributed to the program for 19 years and was already receiving benefits. Under a 1954 law, Social Security benefits were denied to persons deported for, among other things, having been a member of the Communist party. Accordingly, Mr. Nestor's benefits were terminated. He appealed the termination arguing, among other claims, that promised Social Security benefits were a contract and that Congress could not renege on that contract. In its ruling, the Court rejected this argument and established the principle that entitlement to Social Security benefits is not contractual right.



To: Wayners who wrote (140746)8/13/2012 1:09:13 AM
From: Paul V.1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224750
 
Wayners, How many elderly, disabled and other people to you want to place in poverty by doing away with Social Security? Wasn't one of the basic reason that President Johnson passed his Great Society Program to get individuals out of poverty?