SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Win Smith who wrote (198196)8/22/2012 8:29:12 PM
From: JohnM  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 541326
 
So far as his desirability as a speaker for the conservative self-love circuit, a pretty darn small part, I'd say. Now that he's got visibility, I imagine his chosen audience is about as interested in what serious scholars think of Ferguson as they are in what serious scholars think of, say, global warming or supply side economics. These gigs aren't oriented toward the reality-based community.

That's not the problem. Those lecture circuits are several fold--businesses, college campuses, and so on. The college campus portion will be in trouble should his Harvard prestige crumble. And, you may be surprised, those college campus visits can be quite profitable.

Ferguson's claim to fame is his scholarship before it is any political position he takes. And if those scholarship creds suffer, the lecture circuit bit suffers.

It's very difficult to build a strong academic reputation, one that attracts all sorts of flies, including the ones Ferguson now has buzzing around him. But it's quite easy to lose it.



To: Win Smith who wrote (198196)8/22/2012 11:33:38 PM
From: Bread Upon The Water  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 541326
 

Don't know about Ferguson, but Murray appeared perfectly aware of the game he was playing.



Murray has performed a valuable service. We as a Nation need to have a conversation, and not a shouting match, about whether Murray's thesis and statistics are true enough and if so why, and if not, why?

The subjects he takes on need to become unpoliticized as possible so we can get them right.