To: Lazarus_Long who wrote (10568 ) 11/29/1997 6:43:00 AM From: William H Huebl Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 94695
Ohh goodie, a challenge, James! Before you start, what I am about to do is show you can do the same thing with TA as you can statistics... so that's the caveat! "Can anyone make the case that a serious collapse (a) has already started? (b) will start soon (in the next month)? (c) will start in the next 6 months?" The "already started" case can be made that we are experience bouts of lower highs and lower lows, the definition of a bear market. This has not happened since before this move started in 1994. What woould DISPROVE this case is a break above 8,200... something I expect to happen in January 1998. Will start soon case is more difficult to prove as on three separate occasions, the DOW for example, has bounced off a trend line (semi-log chart) started Nov 1994, tested 7/24/96 (1), again 4/3/97 (2) and lastly 10/27/97 (3). A case AGAINST this theory can be made by showing the test to this trend line did NOT fail even though there was substantial turmoil in the markets. The final case, the one I like is the start in 6 months which I believe will happen. A TA reason might be that the tests happened 21, 8 and 5 months apart... surely Fibonnacci numbers with the next test in Jan, then Mar then April and then failure. An FA reason might be the problems of the stores in hiring XMAS workers is the hidden employment inflation about to burst forth upon the scene. To my mind, the bear still slumbers but it is a fitfull sleep, one to be soon disturbed by the reality of an economics lesson gone awry. Thanks for asking and I am SURELY interested in what others may think! Regards, Bill PS We skipped Fib no 13 for some reason... so we may well skip again and it could be CLOSER. BWDIK?