Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Mainstream Politics and Economics -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: gamesmistress who wrote (25251)	8/28/2012 12:10:12 PM
From: koan	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 85487

<<You call that "data"? The author of the article is arbitrarily combining Independents with Democrats in their leanings in that sentence. Apparently neither he nor you understands the meaning of the word "Independent" since they have given elections to Republicans at least as often as they have Democrats. Bottom line: Your statement IS a lie. >> It may be a lot of things, but not a lie. You use that word very easily when you are caught being foolish. That poll, makes two different polls, that show how Independent "Scientist's" lean whne they have to vote either Dem or Pub. Your above statement (which is nothing but your guess (very scientific)) talks about random independents. The article is talking about how Independent scientists's lean. And they did a poll, not guess! Try and follow the thesis of the conversation. You cannot guess about random independents when we are talking about scientist's. Geesh.