Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Any info about Iomega (IOM)? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Gary Wisdom who wrote (37770)	11/29/1997 12:24:00 PM
From: Spank	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 58324

re: Barrons I'd like to think that Barrons' would be responsive to an emailing barrage from the Iomaniacs that hang-out here, but I doubt they'd really give much of a damn. They wrote a really trashy article on Osicom a few weeks back and the stock still hasn't recovered. Now they're being sued by the company and the ceo. Interestingly, the article they ran was remarkably similar to one run in the London Times which ended up with the L.T. printing a public apology & retraction. Lots of Osicom holders were saying that Barron's is under the influence of market makers and BIG shorts. Is this another attempt to drive IOM down so the shorts can get out? -Spank by the way, by my count, there have been about 1644 individual posters on this thread since its inception. I think I read recently that there are only 5003 shareholders (could that be right?).