Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Any info about Iomega (IOM)? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Senthil Sankarappan who wrote (37776)	11/29/1997 1:07:00 PM
From: Gary Wisdom	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 58324

Senthil, I fully agree with you . . . While the nervous nellies sell, I'll have my finger on the buy button.

To: Senthil Sankarappan who wrote (37776)	11/29/1997 1:25:00 PM
From: Thomas L Nielsen	Respond to of 58324

Senthil I agree with your spin on the Barron's article. That article won't affect Iomega, the company , in any way. Bearish articles against IOM or anyone at the top will be appearing in all kinds of publications. Words may cause dips but beating the competition in growth, R&D, sales, popularity, acceptance of TRADEMARK, and the bottom line is IOM's path. Bring on those bear articles because they help the dipping that allows me to skim a little. Tom

To: Senthil Sankarappan who wrote (37776)	11/29/1997 9:08:00 PM
From: Naggrachi	Respond to of 58324

Re: False confidence for the shorts. Senthil, your not the only person happy to see Barrons article. The same thoughts that you stated in your post crossed my mind this morning. Great minds think alike, I guess. :-) Zead

To: Senthil Sankarappan who wrote (37776)	11/30/1997 12:36:00 AM
From: Rocky Reid	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 58324

>>Fun part of this game is that it will drive out the nervous nellies out of IOM and hopefully give a false confidence to the Shorts and even bring more shorts into IOM. << This is the last thing that an Iomaniac wants. This same situation existed at the beginning of this year, and IOM stock was buried. The shorts piled on and drove the stock down...down...down to 14. All the while, the Iomaniacs threw ridiculous claims of "short squeeze" out to the wind. It never materialized, and instead we had a thread full of grumbling, insulting, unhappy investors. One must remember thet IOM is not IOMG. Different stock markets. Different times in the company's life. The short squeeze that drove up IOMG occured because of the climate in the NASDAQ exchange, and because fewer people had heard of Iomega. The cat is out of the bag now, and it looks like Iomega's best times could be coming to a close. We have the Sony HiFi drive coming out. Clique has been delayed...delayed...and delayed yet again. Second half of 1988? Try 1999. Maybe. And SparQ is about to put a serious hurt on Jaz. As soon as the SCSI version of SparQ is available in Jan/Feb, I'm there. BTW, the Barron's article said that in addition to its 200MB capacity, it is also faster than Zip. Is this true?