Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: RMF who wrote (55857)	9/15/2012 4:05:42 AM
From: RMF	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 71588

news.nationalgeographic.com

To: RMF who wrote (55857)	9/15/2012 6:59:48 AM
From: joseffy	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 71588

Mind-numbed lefty RMF goes through his tired paces.

To: RMF who wrote (55857)	9/15/2012 5:28:47 PM
From: d[-_-]b	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 71588

Yes - nothing has happened that doesn't normally happen - erosion is natural, especially at the waters edge. But back to the point - did Obama stop the oceans from rising?

To: RMF who wrote (55857)	9/18/2012 10:24:21 AM
From: TimF	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 71588

Yes, I understand that, but when you ridicule Obama for that aren't you also ridiculing the science of global warming? No. First of all the science doesn't show that the alarmists predictions are correct. And what's being ridiculed isn't even the claims of the alarmists, but the idea that if by some chance the alarmists are correct that Obama is going to stop it from happening, and also the messianic tone that the statement was made with. What's being ridiculed is "Obama the savior", not "CO2 is a greenhouse gas", or "the temperature has been increasing since the end of the little ice age".