Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Plastics to Oil - Pyrolysis and Secret Catalysts and Alterna -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Joseph B. Schmidt who wrote (28870)	10/14/2012 4:56:34 PM
From: old 'n cranky	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 53574

I don't need to re-read anything. My original post was to the subject, not to any individual. You chose to respond. "That's your interpretation, not mine." Obviously. I try to confine my posts to MY opinions. Smearing a stranger with ZERO evidence. That's not "investigative reporting". It's an unjustified attack on a stranger, devoid of any factual connection to the act. I'll be happy to call it "investigative reporting" if such a connection is made.....good luck with that. Meantime, I think it's fair to expect that people that aren't public figures/company officers not be the subject of rank speculation. He's one of over a thousand Jordan Thompsons in the US alone....and no one knows if that's the posters real name anyway. Pretend for a minute that the poster who provided the original link had elected to call himself Joseph B. Schmidt. I know that speculation is within the rules here. It just doesn't seem right to me that a guy who may have nothing whatsoever to do with this suddenly finds himself to be "a person of interest".