Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: locogringo who wrote (514428)	10/17/2012 12:12:07 PM
From: Alan Smithee	4 Recommendations Respond to of 793575

Obama lied about Libya and the people know it. Moving back to the failed economy is the winner Problem is, next week's focus is FP. I think Romney needs to focus on Iran, Venezuela (recall those missiles down there), Fast 'n Furious. He also needs to revisit the Libya issue, but the focus needs to be on the coverup, not the question of lax security for the mission. Also, WHY was the Ambassador in Benghazi? I'm thinking there's something to the storyline about trying to get back weapons that were given to the "freedom fighters" who have now been discovered to be Al Quaeda affiliated.

To: locogringo who wrote (514428)	10/17/2012 12:13:26 PM
From: FJB	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793575

RE:and Mitt will concentrate on the economy and jobs The next debate is all foreign policy as the topic. 2012presidentialelectionnews.com

To: locogringo who wrote (514428)	10/17/2012 1:10:37 PM
From: mistermj	8 Recommendations Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 793575

Mitt can simply recite the Benghazi timeline next Monday and pepper Obama with unanswerable questions. In fact, Mitt doesn't even need to ask questions...the questions are obvious. Just make sure to underline the key points in the timeline. It couldn't be any easier for Mitt. Mitt's in the drivers seat...big time. I can't wait for some of these answers or non answers. Mr. President why did we watch the Benghazi attack for hours in real time and have no response? Were you contacted? If not, why not? If yes what did you do? What assets were available to provide assistance during the many hours we watched the attack take place? Ok, if it's Hillary's State Department is Hillary responsible for Benghazi? Are you going to ask for her resignation? Mr. President if you thought it was a terrorist attack on Sept. 12 in the Rose Garden...do you regret then jetting off to Las Vegas for a fund raiser? It goes on and on, full of traps for Obama. Good luck preparing for that.

To: locogringo who wrote (514428)	10/17/2012 6:48:13 PM
From: locogringo	4 Recommendations Respond to of 793575

Somebody agrees with me. Rope-a-dope, or hook-line-and-sinker...........Romney got him good, and ON THE RECORD............... Romney trapped Obama in the Second Debate Candy Crowley then asked the President about the buck stopping at his desk and he launched into his tirade about being offended by Romney calling him out the Sunday morning after the murders and said "The day after, I stood in the Rose Garden and told people this was an act of terror." Bam! For a lawyer -- any lawyer--even one who never practiced like Romney -- this is the stuff movies are made of. This is the kind of admission we are always sniffing out and Obama, a lawyer himself who was obviously trying his hand at Clintonian hair splitting, offered it up knowing full well that's not what he said. And he got Candy to go along with him. Bad Candy. <snip> While Romney might not have had 100% alpha male domination over the answer, what he did that seems to be overlooked by way too many, was to expose the President as a liar and not just a misspeaker on an issue everyone is talking about. And, this is not just conjecture or spin. We have the ironclad transcript and video of Obama asserting this was a spontaneous demonstration--directly contradicting his statement at the debate. Yet, he brazenly reaffirmed at the debate that he said it was an act of terror While it is risky to ask such a question, Romney got him to repeat his admission several times--so he can't say he mispoke--and can therefore EASILY impeach his credibility with the actual transcript and video of the Rose Garden statement. Romney wasn't just phumphering around. He was onto something average folks (jurors, if you will) see because, well, it isn't hard to find--it's right there in the open and completely verifiable--this guy is lying! Read more: americanthinker.com