Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rocky Mountain Int'l (OTC:RMIL former OTC:OVIS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: michael d kugler who wrote (22912)	12/1/1997 7:31:00 PM
From: s martin	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 55532

You don't mean to say that they are failing to disclose material facts, do you ? <G>

To: michael d kugler who wrote (22912)	12/1/1997 7:32:00 PM
From: Riley G	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 55532

This is news to me. RG

To: michael d kugler who wrote (22912)	12/1/1997 7:34:00 PM
From: Dan Merfeld	Respond to of 55532

Oh my Gosh, Mikie, you don't say. And that's what all those numbers were about? Well that does it, I'm selling. You just did it and can't believe I can type this because I am shaking so bad. Got to go. I have this urge to just ball my eyes out now that you have awakened me to this Yeah right!!

To: michael d kugler who wrote (22912)	12/1/1997 7:56:00 PM
From: KMT	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 55532

MK: I can hear that extra 5MM getting sucked out the window in a settlement.... whhhoooossshhhhh. KMT

To: michael d kugler who wrote (22912)	12/1/1997 8:06:00 PM
From: KMT	Respond to of 55532

MK: But 97-21063 is filed in the 11th Circuit in Dade County. There is some apparent disagreement between OVIS and the people behind the Baron/Nelsons deal. I've figured it out. Those people are just massively short. That's the only reason for this frivilous lawsuit. KMT (Tongue in cheek for humor impaired.)

To: michael d kugler who wrote (22912)	12/1/1997 8:18:00 PM
From: Riley G	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 55532

I just spoke with Gary Morgan. As usual MK's stories are full of half truths. Gary Morgan said that RMIL filed suits against those mentioned for overstating the value of the properties and failure to hand over the books(or something like that). RMIL does not know of any counter suits, nor has Bancentro (sp) taken over any said properties in Nicaragua. RMIL is going to fax me some of the information tomorrow. I'm off to dinner, RG ---- To: s martin (22900 ) From: michael d kugler Monday, Dec 1 1997 7:28PM EST Reply # of 22945 For your edification:..........Remember all those crazy numbers I posted? Did you ever wonder why Riley never asked me to elaborate? Did you ever wonder why there is little talk about the garment business any more? Ever wonder why the yeas won't discuss Nicaragua? Let me lay one more number on you. 97-21063. All the numbers I have posted represent lawsuits, old and new. But 97-21063 is filed in the 11th Circuit in Dade County. There is some apparent disagreement between OVIS and the people behind the Baron/Nelsons deal. My understanding is that OVIS filed the original suit after a flurry of letters between legal eagles. The people from Baron/Nelsons have countersued to get paid for the original deal. My understanding is that Morgan has apparently refused to comply with anywhere near the terms of the original deal and is being countersued for fraud, and breech of contract. I have also been told, by someone I deem a reliable source, that Bancentro has taken over the operation in Nicaragua. The big question here is why this company goes out of its way to publicize lawsuits connected to the squeeze and won't talk about apparent material events occurring within the operation. Certainly this, and perhaps some other suits, should be disclosed to shareholders. And the company needs to make a statement now regarding the situation in Nicaragua.