Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : President Barack Obama -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brian Sullivan who wrote (125440)	10/28/2012 1:20:25 AM
From: Sr K	2 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 149317

An editorial endorsement without mentioning the word "corn" is not believable. Maybe I'll read it tomorrow. If Romney stood up in public and said he would veto any corn subsidy in Iowa or ethanol subsidy, I would support him. It could even be triggered by the price of corn. Subsidy is OK if corn prices are low, but above a certain level, they should fade away. I want no corn subsidy for Iowa and no orange juice subsidy for Florida. But I'm not a politician.

To: Brian Sullivan who wrote (125440)	10/28/2012 1:35:26 AM
From: Sr K	1 Recommendation Respond to of 149317

They endorsed him believing that he has to have and will have the Democratic Party agenda. They didn't proofread their endorsement: "Romney could be assured that Democrats would work to defeat him as hard as Republicans worked against Obama is if he were to adopt the reactionary agenda of the most extreme elements of the Republican Party. Romney had to tack to the right during the primary season. Since then, he has recalibrated his campaign to focus on his concern for the middle class, and that is believable if the real Mitt Romney is the one on display as governor of Massachusetts who passed a health care reform plan that became the model for the one passed by Congress. " And they believe in Romney 3.