SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Alighieri who wrote (684491)11/12/2012 10:36:55 AM
From: joseffy  Respond to of 1576375
 
Soros' Politico.



To: Alighieri who wrote (684491)11/12/2012 12:02:37 PM
From: tejek  Respond to of 1576375
 
Well, I think the objective facts disagree with that assertion. The Democrats gained two seats in the Senate, did better than anyone dreamed. The Democrats gained more votes in the House, gained a few seats in the House. President Obama won a resounding electoral college victory and won the popular vote, I think by two and a half million votes. [Note: It's actually 3.3 million as of now.]To suggest the Republicans did well in this election makes no sense at all.

President Obama was very clear. He spoke about this all of the time: if reelected, he is not going to extend tax breaks to millionaires and billionaires. He was reelected. Many of us ran on a similar program. We were reelected.

So I think Mr. Boehner has got to understand they lost, and let the wishes of the majority of the people in this country prevail.

sync.democraticunderground.com



To: Alighieri who wrote (684491)11/12/2012 12:07:09 PM
From: tejek  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1576375
 
The president campaigned for reelection on ending the Bush-era tax cuts for incomes above $250,000, and has said he would veto any extension of those rates, which would likely be part of any deal to avert the fiscal cliff. Obama also said tax hikes would be needed as part of a “balanced” approach to deficit reduction, which would include spending cuts. But during a series of appearance on morning TV shows, Norquist, the leader of Americans for Tax Reform, tried to put the brakes on any deal that would include tax rate increases. At one point, he mischaracterized Obama’s positions.

So then, Norquist, the ultimate poopy head, has his bubble firmly in place. The dude doesn't realize his 15 minutes are up. Call Palin, Norquist, she'll explain it to you.



To: Alighieri who wrote (684491)11/12/2012 12:49:21 PM
From: i-node  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1576375
 
Al, why do you believe tax rates should be increased on the wealthy?

Obviously, it doesn't make even a slight dent in the deficit problem. So, what is the underlying reason for increasing those tax rates?