SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: pcstel who wrote (58995)11/14/2012 5:06:38 PM
From: LLCF  Respond to of 71588
 
Walmart makes good coin off that service and a LOT of their employees use it. Better talk to Walmart. :)

DAK



To: pcstel who wrote (58995)11/14/2012 7:04:48 PM
From: Peter Dierks1 Recommendation  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 71588
 
That is brilliant. It would not stop illegal immigrants from following work to North Dakota, but it would put a significant tax on the money sent home.

What is the chance it would have an unintended consequence? Another solution to the problem (an illegal would face) would be to bring the family to the money instead of sending the money to the family.

I have talked with many Sudanese who despise the immigration system. They waited and often cannot bring family over while others waltz in seemingly without effort or restriction. To have been run through the ringer only to witness others flaunting the system should be very frustrating.

BTW: Check the header, I linked to your post.



To: pcstel who wrote (58995)12/1/2012 7:42:51 PM
From: LLCF  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 71588
 
Just more government regulation on the companies that move money.... then underground money companies would form.

Migrants move to where it is known companies will hire them... Migrants came to AZ during the RE boom because BUSINESSES WENT TO MEXICO AND RECRUITED THEM... good ole marketing. If you don't want migrants coming in simply make more stringent labour laws... like unions want. :))

Kinda funny that the Unions were against all this all along... they didn't WANT companies to be able to bring migrants in to do a lot of these jobs. Aint THAT a kick in the pants?!! Pat Buchanan, Ross Perot.... unions.... all warned.

Now we got tens of millions of immigrants here (Oh, they almost all "came" legally, BTW... originally) and all sorts of them are citizens... and suddenly there is this HUGE surprise that they actually vote and there is all this dithering and consternation about "demographics".

Well, the bottom line is... the "Republican" demographic (old white men... lol) BROUGHT THEM HERE so THEY could make money! LOL

Strange brew.

DAK



To: pcstel who wrote (58995)1/25/2013 10:43:36 AM
From: Peter Dierks1 Recommendation  Respond to of 71588
 
Solving the Immigration Puzzle
Some want illegals to return to their native countries and 'wait in line' like everyone else. There is no line..
By JEB BUSH AND CLINT BOLICK
January 24, 2013, 8:17 p.m. ET

The nation's capital is awash with ideas about how to fix America's immigration policy. The sudden ferment on this issue, which was largely dormant since efforts at comprehensive reform were torpedoed five years ago, is as welcome as it is overdue. The growing consensus on both sides of the political aisle that something needs to be done should not be squandered, for such opportunities are rare and fleeting.

Some policy makers are calling for piecemeal changes—such as issuing visas for high-skilled workers and investors, or conferring legal status on immigrants who were illegally brought into the country as children. Congress should avoid such quick fixes and commit itself instead to comprehensive immigration reform.

In some conservative circles, the word "comprehensive" in the context of immigration reform is an epithet—a code word for amnesty. People who oppose such reform declare that securing the United States border must come before moving toward broader reform.

Such an approach is shortsighted and self-defeating. Border security is inextricably intertwined with other aspects of immigration policy. The best way to prevent illegal immigration is to make sure that we have a fair and workable system of legal immigration. The current immigration system is neither.


The immigration system is like a jigsaw puzzle. If one or more pieces are out of whack, the puzzle makes no sense. To fix the system, Congress must make sure all of the pieces fit together, logically and snugly.

To do so, several realities must be faced squarely, including:

It is not law enforcement but the law itself that is broken. The nation has changed dramatically since the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, and that legislation has not held up well. It has been patched over so many times that it is hopelessly complex and incoherent. We need to start from scratch.

The nature of the border-security problem has evolved. The only tried-and-true method of reducing illegal immigration is a bad economy. Thus, with a dismal American economy and an improving Mexican one, the net immigration from Mexico is now zero: As many Mexicans are leaving the U.S. as are entering it.

The far greater border-security threat is paramilitaristic drug cartels that often are also involved in human smuggling, increasingly from Central American countries. The U.S. needs to coordinate closely with Mexico and focus its resources on defeating the cartels. The nation also needs to continue harnessing technology to identify risky foreign visitors and swiftly deport those who commit crimes or overstay their visas.

The driver of immigration policy is "chain migration." Since the 1960s, the vast majority of legal immigrants have come pursuant to a very broad definition of "family reunification"—which includes not only spouses and minor children but parents and siblings. Family preferences account for two-thirds of all legal immigrants, crowding out work-based immigration and placing increased pressure on social services.

When extended family members obtain legal status, they too are entitled to family preferences. This chain migration does not promote the nation's economic interests.

There is no "line." Critics of comprehensive reform often argue that illegal immigrants should return to their native countries and wait in line like everyone else who wants to come to America. But unless they have relatives in the U.S. or can fit within the limited number of work-based visas, no line exists for such individuals.

For most aspiring immigrants, the only means of legal admission to this country is an annual "diversity lottery" that randomly awards visas to 55,000 foreigners. There are roughly 250 applicants for each visa every year. The absence of a meaningful avenue of access increases the pressure for illegal immigration.

The U.S. needs workers of all types. The birthrate in this country has fallen below the level necessary to sustain the population at the very time that millions of Americans are leaving the workforce and expecting retirement benefits. The nation needs energetic young workers to spur the economy and support an ever-increasing social-welfare burden.

The only alternatives to increased immigration are mounting debts or reduced social services. A practicable system of work-based immigration for both high-skilled and low-skilled immigrants—a system that will include a path to citizenship—will help us meet workforce needs, prevent exportation of jobs to foreign countries and protect against the exploitation of workers.

America especially needs high-skill workers. The K-12 education system is not producing nearly enough graduates with the skills needed for a vibrant 21st-century economy. This country has attracted, and still does attract, the best and brightest from throughout the world to its universities and businesses. But once here, even the most talented students are not assured that they will receive visas enabling them to work following graduation, and high-skill workers and entrepreneurs have no sure path to citizenship.

Other nations—including Canada, New Zealand and even China—are luring away students, workers and entrepreneurs with more sensible and welcoming immigration policies. If we do not adapt, we will be increasingly unable to compete.

Amnesty promotes illegal immigration. The U.S. must find a fair way to deal with its 11 million illegal immigrants without sending the message that America's laws can be broken with impunity. Crossing the border illegally must have consequences. At the same time, we must recognize that children who were brought here illegally have committed no crime and in most instances know no other country.

Immigrants replenish the American spirit. Most immigrants come here to secure a better life for themselves and their families. They cherish the values of hard work, faith, family, enterprise and patriotism that have made this country great. Meanwhile, many who were lucky enough to have been born here have grown complacent or even disdainful of these values. America's immigration system should provide opportunities for people who share the country's core values to become citizens, thereby strengthening the nation as have countless immigrants have before them.

Despite a polarized polity, the country has a historic opportunity for bipartisan reform. It is time to seize the moment.

Mr. Bush, the governor of Florida from 1999 to 2007, is chairman of the Foundation for Excellence in Education. Mr. Bolick is vice president for litigation at the Goldwater Institute. Their book, "Immigration Wars: Forging an American Solution," will be published in March by Threshold Editions/Simon & Schuster.

online.wsj.com