SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Trimble Navigation -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: David who wrote (1896)12/2/1997 1:02:00 PM
From: Robert A. Sutherland  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 3506
 
It appears more like a valuation/risk differential was applied.

We know that Ashtech management is handed the controls. We know that
Magellan had 9mos sales of $50mm(97) vs $56mm(96) and they were
losing money (latest Orbital filing, Nov 14,97). We also know that
Ashtech '96 revenue was $47.4m, and annualized growth was ~35% Q1 '97
(can't find that on their new web page, so going from memory).

I think, based on these observations, that relative valuations
would have been 50/50 which would place both entities sales at ~$67mm
(Although Ashtech may have an edge here as they are growing revenue).
The $75mm is a good one and would infer a 1.1x valuation to sales.
Not very good. I think some of the venture types wanted their money
back, with the chance to make alot more on the combined entity.
Orbital sees it as a way to limit there intermediate term losses with Magellan.

Ashtech is profitable and growing, where Magellan is not. However,
Magellan has access to Orbcomm and the Rockwell car navigation
product line, and knowledge of low cost manufacturing methodolgy,
where Astech does not (Trimble doesn't have these, either). This is
potentially where the largest growth areas will be. Also, Ashtech
still has its arrangements with Matsushita and Philips.

It looks like a good fit. Hopefully the combined company will be
worth more than the two individual companies take separately.