SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : CSGI ...READY FOR TAKE-OFF! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: TEDennis who wrote (1458)12/2/1997 3:10:00 PM
From: angel  Respond to of 3391
 
I also want to commend you for being open and honest about this company and popping the fully-automated balloon. I never could understand how people with obviously no computer programming experience like Tech and Stockman can be making the claims they were making. Its nice to know that there are people you can trust to know what they are talking about on these boards.



To: TEDennis who wrote (1458)12/2/1997 5:35:00 PM
From: Richard Dunaven  Respond to of 3391
 
Ted, thanks for taking the time to post your observations here.

They have actually given me a little more faith in my investment in CSGI. Even with 3-4 automated conversion houses there will be plenty of work to go around.

Lets look at it from a marketing standpoint:

If there is a $200-600 Bil market potential and CSGI is best suited for the non IBM market which I've read is 20% of the total their potential market using the low # is 40 Bil.

If only 30% of the effected market goes with a conversion process in the next 2 yrs that would be 12 bil. The balance might wait or do it in house etc. I'm trying to be conservative.

If they get 5% of that market it would be $600 mil.

I believe the market price is based on $1 per line so lets be conservative and say that they charge .30 per line that would be 180 mil. in rev over the next 2 yrs.

If their burn rate is 4 mil per yr which I believe will be the case as we have been told they can convert close to 4 mil lines per day with the 30 employees then there earnings per share and cash on hand could be tremendous.

Since they use their alliance partners to do the coordination they should not have to invest in add'l personnel.

Like you said there will be a lot of work to go around so I think it's worth while to stick around and see how the contracts fall next year. It seems to me that Q1 and Q2 should be a time when co's start issuing contracts if their serious about having an outside source do their Yr 2k work.

Thanks again for your comments!!

Ric D.



To: TEDennis who wrote (1458)12/2/1997 9:03:00 PM
From: TEDennis  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 3391
 
All: The following text was cut & pasted from an email I received from Ron Bishop, President of CSGI. It contains the answers to several of the questions that were presented to him at the stockholders' meeting I attended a couple of weeks ago. Other than taking quite a bit of time to reformat the text into SI freeform format, and correct a couple of typos, it is exactly as I received it. No textual editing was done.

Ron is to be commended for taking the time to respond to these questions.

TED

***************************
Ted, below are the answers to many of the questions. Some of the questions are not going to be answered because to do so would be giving out inside information. And some are not going to be answered because they do not deserve an answer.

1) What languages are supported and when will additional ones be added?

ANSWER:Here is everything we support:

IBM(DOS/MVS) : MVS/ESA,DOS/VSE, COBOL 85, COBOL 74, VSAM, CICS, IDMS, DB2, IMS

HONEYWELL/BULL: COBOL, IDS I/II, JCL, FLAT FILES, TP 8, DMIV, TSM

HEWLETT PACKARD 3000: COBOL, MOE/XL, IMAGE

UNISYS(1100/2200): COBOL, ECL, TIPS, FLAT FILES, DMS 2200

DIGITAL (open VMS): COBOL, CONTROL LANG, FLAT FILES

UNIX: COBOL (MF), SHELL SCRIPTS

We expect to support PL1 in Q1 98

2) What does the remediation tool run on?
ANSWER: Our ConSyGen runs on standard Sun hardware, is written in C, and runs against a standard Oracle database. We have recently expanded processing capacity 10 fold by adding faster hardware. Using our remote Conversion Centers (Singapore, Ottawa), we can off load processing if need be. And we can just add additional Sun computers as our volume increases.

3) Does CSGI really consider ALYD to be a competitor?
ANSWER: Of course ALYD is a competitor. Anyone who makes code compliant for the year 2000 is a competitor. That is why I stated at the stockholders meeting that some of of biggest competitors are those clients who are purchasing a toolset from the likes of Viasoft and making an attempt to do the y2k corrections themselves.

4) What does CSGI management think of Bemer and Vertex 2000?
ANSWER: We have not taken the time to do a detailed analysis so it would not be proper to make a comment.

5) Questions about comments on the web by competitors and SI individuals.
ANSWER: It would be inappropriate to spend the time in verbal discussions with individuals on the web. We do not pay anyone to hype our company on the web. We will prove to the world that Consygen has an outstanding toolset through performance.

6) Does Consygen condone such behavior?
ANSWER: No we do not condone such effort, but there is little we can do short of getting into ongoing web discussions. Consygen will not conduct campaigns to put down any specific companies. We will just continue to promote what we have and what we can provide.

7) Do they or have they ever paid anyone to hype their stock on the internet? What about Shawn Murphy, Steve Sprunger, etc?
ANSWER: Again, we pay no one to hype our stock on the web. Our PR agency (Janis-Elliot Jacobson 312-943-1100) does not participate in web discussions.

8) Do they read SI and do they know all the strange things that people are saying about them?
ANSWER: We do not read SI on a regular basis. However, there are lots of people who are quick to let us know when strange things have been said about us. Again, we are going to run an honest and moral operation and let performance do the talking.

9) How do they compare their toolset to Zitl?
ANSWER: We have not done a detailed analysis of any Y2k company. We will continue to promote our services (date expansion or windowing) on IBM, DEC, H-P, UNISYS, HONEYWELL/BULL,and all UNIX.

10) Did they ever apply for NASDAQ listing?
ANSWER: Yes we have applied for NASDAQ Small Cap listing. We are presently traded on OTC as CSGI. As to when we will get listed, we have no way of knowing. We have filed all the papers necessary and now it is a waiting game.

11) How much code do you expect to get from Agiss?
ANSWER: It would be impossible to know the answer to that question. Agiss is one of our teaming partners. We have agreed to locate a Conversion Center in their facilities. So I am sure that we will get code from them as they receive contracts.

12) Why is the stock price going straight down when they have supposed contracts?
ANSWER: I think we are suffering the same problem as many other y2k companies, ie few contracts being awarded. It is our feeling this is because 1) many companies (and government) currently do not have budgets approved to release contracts (we expect this to change in early 1998), 2) many companies have not really accepted that there is a y2k problem, 3) we've been told by some that they will start to assess the problem in early 1998, and 4) some are attempting to do it themselves (We have talked to some in this category who are telling us that they are having many problems doing it themselves ........ we hope to eventually receive some of this business).

13) When will Motorola finish testing their code?
ANSWER: We do not have an answer to that question. It is their responsibility. When we committed to do these 2 projects, there was no committment by Motorola as to when they will finish their testing. Nor was their any committment by Motorola to give additional contracts. As the press release stated, we hope we can receive some paying contracts from Motorola after the successful completion and successful testing of these 2 projects.

14) When will we see another contract announcement?
ANSWER: Cannot answer because to do so would be giving out inside information.

15) Is CSGI talking to banks, local or state government, fortune 50 companies,etc?
ANSWER: As are most y2k companies, we are talking to many people. I cannot give any more details as that would be inside information.

16) What is your burn rate?
ANSWER: At the present time, our annual burn rate is between $4M and $5Mper year.