SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Dividend investing for retirement -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Spekulatius who wrote (13284)12/6/2012 5:02:38 PM
From: Bridge Player  Respond to of 34328
 
I have often been bemused by the term "enterprise value".

It sounds like that's what the whole company is worth, right? The value of the enterprise. Like maybe, "private market value".

So you compare current market price with "enterprise value", and if it's a big discount, the stock is a "value", right?

Hardly. What bugs me is that the bigger the long term debt, the larger the "enterprise value". Which hardly sounds like a good way to value a company.

For example, take any company, and just make believe that the debt is increased by, let's say, 30 billion.

The enterprise value will be increased by that much, too.

Is the company really worth any more? In reality, the company would be staggering under that debt load, and likely to go bankrupt.

I don't like the term.



To: Spekulatius who wrote (13284)12/7/2012 6:48:04 AM
From: zen_lunatic420  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 34328
 
Yes, but you referred to the value you posted as "a 3.8B$ market cap", so really, it's you that is "mixing up market cap with Enterprise value" and hence the cause of my confusion.