Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Naxos Resources (NAXOF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JP who wrote (6178)	12/3/1997 11:06:00 AM
From: liontamer	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 20681

dear jp you are right. i should have stated that it is my opinion that this is the largest precious metals find in the history of the world. also i have no authorization from anybody to state what i do state.i have no insider info and am not an employee of naxos. i am simply a shareholder who has formed an opinion and my opinion is stated above. hopefully nobody will buy or sell a stock based upon opinions they find here, but i do have to admit that i have told over 250 people here in mo. to buy naxos and these people have bought in excess of 2,000,000 shares and not one of them hass ever sold. once again, it is my humble opinion that we have the largest precios metals find in the history of the world out at franklin lake but you are absolutely correct that the proof will only come through ledoux certification hopefully today or tomorrow. your friend, the liontamer.

To: JP who wrote (6178)	12/3/1997 6:12:00 PM
From: JP	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 20681

This is about the Scientific American Magazine article referred to by someone in the past two-three weeks. "Allegedly," there was to have been an article in the December issue about the Johnson-Lett recovery process. Or at least an article mentioning the process in the body copy. I've driven Barnes & Nobel crazy calling twice a day asking if it is in, but to no avail. Out of desperation I logged onto the Sci Amer web site and found the December issue that had nothing whatsoever about dessert dirts, assaying methodology, or anything relevant to the subject. I reviewed every article in the issue online, and then, just in case, did the same with the November and October issues. Nothing............. Who is pumping us up about Scientific American? How can someone have seen what isn't there? Once again, what the hell is going on? Someone please tell me I'm not out of my mind and that they, too, have seen/heard something about Johnson-Lett and the December issue of Sci. Amer. John