Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LLCF who wrote (61296)	1/16/2013 9:09:24 AM
From: Peter Dierks	2 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 71588

Since you seem not to entirely lack the intellectual capacity to comprehend simple syllogism one must assume you adhere to the Alinsky school of thought. One must therefore assume that most of what you post is a deliberate fabrication designed to deflect rather than enlighten.

To: LLCF who wrote (61296)	1/16/2013 1:54:16 PM
From: Joe Btfsplk	4 Recommendations Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 71588

Quotation of the Day… Posted: 15 Jan 2013 04:48 AM PST … is from page 49 of Gottfried Dietze’s insightful 1973 tract, Two Concepts of the Rule of Law; by “Law State” Dietze here means a government meant to be kept limited by constitutional rules, as opposed to a state that is overtly an instrument for carrying out whatever might be the wishes and whims of the sovereign (be the sovereign a Mao-like monster or a collection of people who outvote other people by 50.000001% to 49.999999%): Since the democratic ruler is insatiable, that ruler will assume more and more power. In the end, the formal Law State will be mere window-dressing for a democratic power- and police-state, characterized by such a mass of statutes, rules, and regulations that not much will be left of the libertarian substance of genuine constitutionalism.