SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SilentZ who wrote (694444)1/21/2013 4:37:05 PM
From: longnshort  Respond to of 1575176
 
more pollution, way to go

"On the occasions I might want 32 ounces of soda, I'll buy two bottles."



To: SilentZ who wrote (694444)1/21/2013 5:50:05 PM
From: Tenchusatsu  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1575176
 
Z,
I have no problem with it. 58% of this city is obese. If it reduces that, I'm fine with it.
After five weeks of exercising every weekday and watching what I eat (most of the time) and not seeing any difference on the scale or on my waistline, I've decided to go cold turkey on my one remaining weakness, which is soda.

Yet even then, I'm still against the ban. It's really stupid and just another "nanny state" law. People have to make their OWN decisions on whether to lose weight or not. They can't go to Nanny Bloomberg and say, "Please help us, Mayor, because we can't help ourselves."

Tenchusatsu



To: SilentZ who wrote (694444)1/21/2013 10:27:45 PM
From: steve harris  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 1575176
 
I cannot imagine being written a violation by the NYPD for drinking a picture of Pepsi at my table while you sit at the next table drinking your picture of beer.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News