SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Value Investing -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jurgis Bekepuris who wrote (50806)2/7/2013 11:59:27 AM
From: AFed  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 78715
 
MHP:

I appreciate your comments Jurgis. I've never used GuruFocus before so thanks for the link.

Two subjects:

10% FCF Growth
1. What is the datasource for GuruFocus? I went through the historical MHP filings and could not match many of the historical numbers to GuruFocus.... that is, I am getting to a better FCF growth from the filings than indicated by GuruFocus.

2. Until today, MHP was comprised of a low FCF / low ROIC Education business and a high FCF / high ROIC Financials business. This clouds the Consolidated MHP business financials laid out on the GuruFocus page.

3. I don't want to totally ignore the Global Financial Crisis, but for a business that is inherently levered to well-lubricated Financial Markets (Ratings Biz = more issuance volume, more fees; Indices Biz = fees as % of AUM; Capital IQ Biz = more financial analysts seats filled, more subscription fees), they've been "under-earning" normalized FCF growth between 2009-2011. Reasonable minds can disagree here though, so I wouldn't hold it against someone if they think they're not under-earning.

Settlement $'s
1. You can't dock them 2x for the Settlements. I'm including the illustrative $5bn in the TEV, so I am accounting for it.

2. If you want to take it out of near-term earnings, that's fine, but I would argue that those near-term earnings do not represent MHP's true earnings power.