Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rocky Mountain Int'l (OTC:RMIL former OTC:OVIS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Just My Opinion who wrote (23472)	12/3/1997 9:01:00 PM
From: joseph krinsky	Respond to of 55532

hi al, you say it so good, we watch over our own. how have you been doing, slow now at the track winter racing. no good. take care joey.

To: Just My Opinion who wrote (23472)	12/3/1997 9:09:00 PM
From: s martin	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 55532

Allen These threads are available to post on whether a person owns a stock or not. There are two points of view being posted on almost every stock on SI. If you only wish to hear one side, then skip the posts you don't want to see and you can remain convinced of your wisdom. I for one could care less if you own it or you don't, in fact I don't quite understand, given your beliefs, why there isn't more buying going on by all of you. On the other hand there are those of us who are fascinated by the discrepancies between the information presented by Riley and the company and others such as the Casper Tribune, the mayor of Ten Sleep, Pepsi Cola, Mary's Cutting service, the attorney for MVPH, the District Court in Miami. etc etc. We will probably continue to explore these not in order to convince you to sell. that is your decision, but because some of us learn from these exercises. Freedom of speech is still a part of our Consittution.

To: Just My Opinion who wrote (23472)	12/4/1997 3:31:00 AM
From: shades	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 55532

Jeff: It makes no sense that people would post so many times to knock a stock.. In the beginning, it's possible that the argument could be made that people were here to present another side. No, their credibility is ZERO! Obviously, the people who stayed invested, don't care about what they have to say.. If they did care they would have sold. The nays posted enough baloney to convince a lot of people to sell. I DO NOT SEE HOW, with such PATHETIC DD who could be fooled by them, that AMAZING DD is depressing! NOW they CLAIM we are making FAKE labels and all DREAMING, they have no grasp off the walls that are TUMBLING DOWN around them. So, the average person should ask himself/herself..is there another reason.. At this point it would seem that there has to be. No amount of hemming and hawing, can point in any other direction. (IMO) al EXACTLY, how much more PROOF does the public need that either 1) these nays have PATHETIC DD, or 2) they have SECRETS and ulterior motives, of which TWO of the nays have admitted to. Either way only a weak investor would listen to them, but didn't someone make a coment that they could start a weakly newsletter, HAH!